Bokhari Ahmed M, Vinothkumar Thilla Sekar, Albar Nassreen, Basheer Syed Nahid, Felsypremila Gnanasekaran, Khayat Waad F, Zidane Bassam, Apathsakayan Renugalakshmi
Department of Preventive Dental Sciences, Division of Community Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Jazan University, Jazan, SAU.
Department of Restorative Dental Sciences, Division of Operative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Jazan University, Jazan, SAU.
Cureus. 2024 Apr 15;16(4):e58329. doi: 10.7759/cureus.58329. eCollection 2024 Apr.
There are unfavorable opinions connected with rubber dam isolation amongst dental students during adhesive restorative treatments. The aim of this study was to investigate the various barriers to practicing rubber dam isolation during dental procedures and provide necessary insight towards implementation of rubber dam among undergraduate dental students in Jazan.
A pre-validated questionnaire in English entitled Rubber Dam Isolation Survey (E-RDIS) based on the Capability Opportunity Motivation-Behaviour (COM-B) model of behavioral change wheel was responded by 226 university dental students.
The satisfaction of training was highest among sixth year students (Mean=3.57, p<0.001). Fourth year dental students scored higher in the capability (Mean=3.18) and were more highly motivated to use rubber dams (Mean=4.21). Third year students were more likely to use rubber dams in anterior teeth (Mean=3.52) whereas fourth year students use rubber dam in posterior teeth (Mean=3.74). Lack of motivation was found to be the significant barrier influencing rubber dam usage (odds ratio (OR)=12.1; 3.74, p<0.05).
The satisfaction with training differed among the students of different years. The rubber dam technique might be used more frequently if it were made clear to students that mastering it would be necessary for them to receive good grades.
在粘结修复治疗过程中,牙科学生对橡皮障隔离存在负面看法。本研究的目的是调查牙科操作过程中实施橡皮障隔离的各种障碍,并为吉赞地区本科牙科学生实施橡皮障提供必要的见解。
226名大学牙科学生对一份基于行为改变轮的能力-机会-动机-行为(COM-B)模型预先验证的英文问卷《橡皮障隔离调查(E-RDIS)》进行了回答。
六年级学生对培训的满意度最高(平均值=3.57,p<0.001)。四年级牙科学生在能力方面得分较高(平均值=3.18),使用橡皮障的积极性也更高(平均值=4.21)。三年级学生在前牙使用橡皮障的可能性更大(平均值=3.52),而四年级学生在后牙使用橡皮障(平均值=3.74)。缺乏动机被认为是影响橡皮障使用的重要障碍(优势比(OR)=12.1;3.74,p<0.05)。
不同年级的学生对培训的满意度不同。如果向学生明确说明掌握橡皮障技术对他们取得好成绩是必要的,那么橡皮障技术可能会更频繁地被使用。