Jamakhandi Arvind P, Kuzmic Petr, Sanders Daniel E, Miller Grover P
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas 72205, USA.
Biochemistry. 2007 Sep 4;46(35):10192-201. doi: 10.1021/bi7003476. Epub 2007 Aug 9.
Although a single binary functional complex between cytochrome P450 (P450 or CYP for a specific isoform) and cytochrome P450 reductase (CPR) has been generally accepted in the literature, this simple model failed to explain the experimentally observed catalytic activity of recombinant CYP2E1 in dependence on the total concentration of the added CPR-K56Q mutant. Our rejection of the simplest 1:1 binding model was based on two independent lines of experimental evidence. First, under the assumption of the 1:1 binding model, separate analyses of titration curves obtained while varying either P450 or CPR concentrations individually produced contradictory results. Second, an asymmetric Job plot suggested the existence of higher order molecular complexes. To identify the most probable complexation mechanism, we generated a comprehensive data set where the concentrations of both P450 and P450 were varied simultaneously, rather than one at a time. The resulting two-dimensional data were globally fit to 32 candidate mechanistic models, involving the formation of binary, ternary, and quaternary P450.CPR complexes, in the absence or presence or P450 and CPR homodimers. Of the 32 candidate models (mechanisms), two models were approximately equally successful in explaining our experimental data. The first plausible model involves the binary complex P450.CPR, the quaternary complex (P450)2.(CPR)2, and the homodimer (P450)2. The second plausible model additionally involves a weakly bound ternary complex (P450)2.CPR. Importantly, only the binary complex P450.CPR seems catalytically active in either of the two most probable mechanisms.
尽管细胞色素P450(特定同工型的P450或CYP)与细胞色素P450还原酶(CPR)之间的单一二元功能复合物在文献中已被普遍接受,但这个简单模型无法解释实验观察到的重组CYP2E1的催化活性对添加的CPR-K56Q突变体总浓度的依赖性。我们对最简单的1:1结合模型的否定基于两条独立的实验证据。首先,在1:1结合模型的假设下,分别分析单独改变P450或CPR浓度时获得的滴定曲线产生了相互矛盾的结果。其次,不对称的Job曲线表明存在高阶分子复合物。为了确定最可能的复合机制,我们生成了一个综合数据集,其中P450和CPR的浓度同时变化,而不是一次只改变一个。所得的二维数据全局拟合到32个候选机制模型,这些模型涉及在不存在或存在P450和CPR同二聚体的情况下形成二元、三元和四元P450·CPR复合物。在这32个候选模型(机制)中,有两个模型在解释我们的实验数据方面大致同样成功。第一个合理的模型涉及二元复合物P450·CPR、四元复合物(P450)2·(CPR)2和同二聚体(P450)2。第二个合理的模型还涉及一个弱结合的三元复合物(P450)2·CPR。重要的是,在两种最可能的机制中,似乎只有二元复合物P450·CPR具有催化活性。