Wu A, Edgar D W, Wood F M
Burns Service of Western Australia, University of Western Australia, Australia.
Burns. 2007 Nov;33(7):843-9. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2007.03.015. Epub 2007 Aug 7.
Upper limb (UL) burns commonly result in significant dysfunction. The measurement of disability is vital to assess recovery after burn injury. The QuickDASH questionnaire was developed to evaluate UL disorders. The aim of this study was to evaluate its validity, repeatability and responsiveness for burn patients.
In 2006, 85 patients with UL burns were recruited at Royal Perth Hospital. Each completed both QuickDASH and Burns Specific Health Scale-Brief (BSHS-B) at regular intervals after their burn. Further, 67 patients repeated the questionnaire 1 day after completing it at discharge.
Validity-Criterion validity was demonstrated between QuickDASH and BSHS-B through good correlations (r(2)=-0.79 to -0.89). Construct validity was demonstrated using burn severity markers. QuickDASH scores significantly differed when grouped according to major burn, full thickness burn, surgery and need for hospital admission. Repeatability-QuickDASH showed excellent repeatability (ICC=0.93). Responsiveness-Effect size of QuickDASH was demonstrated to be greater than BSHS-B at all measurement points.
This longitudinal study confirms the validity, repeatability and responsiveness of the QuickDASH outcome measure in patients with upper limb burns. It supports the use of the QuickDASH in this population to help assess change in functional level.
上肢烧伤常导致严重功能障碍。残疾程度的测量对于评估烧伤后的恢复情况至关重要。QuickDASH问卷旨在评估上肢疾病。本研究的目的是评估其在烧伤患者中的有效性、可重复性和反应性。
2006年,皇家珀斯医院招募了85例上肢烧伤患者。每位患者在烧伤后定期完成QuickDASH和烧伤特异性健康量表简表(BSHS-B)。此外,67例患者在出院时完成问卷1天后重复填写。
有效性——通过良好的相关性(r(2)= -0.79至-0.89)证明了QuickDASH与BSHS-B之间的效标效度。使用烧伤严重程度指标证明了结构效度。根据严重烧伤、全层烧伤、手术和住院需求进行分组时,QuickDASH评分存在显著差异。可重复性——QuickDASH显示出极好的可重复性(ICC = 0.93)。反应性——在所有测量点,QuickDASH的效应量均大于BSHS-B。
这项纵向研究证实了QuickDASH结局指标在烧伤患者中的有效性、可重复性和反应性。它支持在该人群中使用QuickDASH来帮助评估功能水平的变化。