Middelbos I S, Fastinger N D, Fahey G C
Department of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana 61801, USA.
J Anim Sci. 2007 Nov;85(11):3033-44. doi: 10.2527/jas.2007-0080. Epub 2007 Aug 8.
Blends of fermentable oligosaccharides in combination with nonfermentable fiber, cellulose, were evaluated for their ability to serve as dietary fibers in dog foods. Using a 6 x 6 Latin square design, 6 diets were evaluated that contained either no supplemental fiber, beet pulp, cellulose, or blends of cellulose, fructooligosaccharides, and yeast cell wall added at 2.5% of the diet. Six ileal-cannulated dogs were fed 175 g of their assigned diet twice daily. Chromic oxide served as a digestibility marker. Nutrient digestibility, fecal microbial populations, fermentative end products, and immunological indices were measured. Total tract DM and OM digestibilities were lowest (P < 0.05) for the cellulose treatment. Crude protein digestibility was lower (P < 0.05) for the treatments containing carbohydrate blends. The cellulose treatment had the lowest (P < 0.05) concentration of bacteria, and all diets containing fermentable fiber had greater (P < 0.05) fecal bifidobacteria concentrations compared with the diets without supplemental fermentable fiber. Lactobacilli concentrations tended to be greater (P < 0.08) in treatments containing fermentable fiber compared with the cellulose treatment. Bifidobacteria and lactobacilli concentrations were similar for the beet pulp treatment compared with the fermentable oligosaccharide blends. Total fecal short-chain fatty acid concentration was greater for the beet pulp treatment (P < 0.05) compared with the control and cellulose treatments. The treatments containing fermentable fiber had greater (P < 0.05) fecal butyrate concentrations compared with cellulose and control treatments. Immune indices were not affected by treatment. Our results suggest that dog foods containing blends of fermentable and nonfermentable carbohydrates produce similar physiological results as dog food containing beet pulp as a fiber source. Therefore, blends of these carbohydrates could be useful substitutes for beet pulp in dog foods.
对可发酵低聚糖与不可发酵纤维(纤维素)的混合物作为犬粮膳食纤维的能力进行了评估。采用6×6拉丁方设计,评估了6种日粮,其中不添加补充纤维、添加甜菜粕、纤维素,或添加占日粮2.5%的纤维素、低聚果糖和酵母细胞壁的混合物。6只回肠造瘘犬每天喂食两次175克指定日粮。氧化铬用作消化率标记物。测定了营养物质消化率、粪便微生物种群、发酵终产物和免疫指标。纤维素处理组的全消化道干物质和有机物消化率最低(P<0.05)。含碳水化合物混合物的处理组粗蛋白消化率较低(P<0.05)。纤维素处理组的细菌浓度最低(P<0.05),与未添加可发酵纤维的日粮相比,所有含可发酵纤维的日粮粪便双歧杆菌浓度更高(P<0.05)。与纤维素处理组相比,含可发酵纤维的处理组乳酸菌浓度往往更高(P<0.08)。与可发酵低聚糖混合物相比,甜菜粕处理组的双歧杆菌和乳酸菌浓度相似。与对照组和纤维素处理组相比,甜菜粕处理组的总粪便短链脂肪酸浓度更高(P<0.