Peeters M Y M, Bras L J, DeJongh J, Wesselink R M J, Aarts L P H J, Danhof M, Knibbe C A J
Department of Clinical Pharmacy, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2008 Mar;83(3):443-51. doi: 10.1038/sj.clpt.6100309. Epub 2007 Aug 8.
As oversedation is still common and significant variability between and within critically ill patients makes empiric dosing difficult, the population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of propofol upon long-term use are characterized, particularly focused on the varying disease state as determinant of the effect. Twenty-six critically ill patients were evaluated during 0.7-9.5 days (median 1.9 days) using the Ramsay scale and the bispectral index as pharmacodynamic end points. NONMEM V was applied for population pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic modeling. Propofol pharmacokinetics was described by a two-compartment model, in which cardiac patients had a 38% lower clearance. Severity of illness, expressed as a Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, particularly influenced the pharmacodynamics and to a minor degree the pharmacokinetics. Deeper levels of sedation were found with an increasing SOFA score. With severe illness, critically ill patients will need downward titration of propofol. In patients with cardiac failure, the propofol dosages should be reduced by 38%.
由于过度镇静仍然很常见,且重症患者之间和患者自身存在显著差异,使得经验性给药变得困难,因此对丙泊酚长期使用的群体药代动力学和药效学进行了研究,特别关注不同疾病状态作为效应的决定因素。以Ramsay评分和脑电双频指数作为药效学终点,对26例重症患者进行了0.7至9.5天(中位数1.9天)的评估。使用NONMEM V进行群体药代动力学和药效学建模。丙泊酚药代动力学用二室模型描述,其中心脏病患者的清除率低38%。用序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分表示的疾病严重程度对药效学影响尤为显著,对药代动力学影响较小。随着SOFA评分增加,镇静深度加深。对于重症患者,需要降低丙泊酚剂量。对于心力衰竭患者,丙泊酚剂量应降低38%。