• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

序贯器官衰竭评估评分所评估的器官功能障碍与重症烧伤患者的预后相关。

Organ dysfunction as estimated by the sequential organ failure assessment score is related to outcome in critically ill burn patients.

作者信息

Lorente José A, Vallejo Alfonso, Galeiras Rita, Tómicic Vinko, Zamora Javier, Cerdá Enrique, de la Cal Miguel A, Esteban Andrés

机构信息

Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos/Grandes Quemados, Hospital Universitario de Getafe, Getafe, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Shock. 2009 Feb;31(2):125-31. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0b013e31817fc3ef.

DOI:10.1097/SHK.0b013e31817fc3ef
PMID:18650779
Abstract

The objectives of the study were to assess organ dysfunction in burn patients by using the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, to determine the relationship between early (day 1) and late (day 4) organ dysfunction, as well as the change in organ dysfunction from admission to day 4, and mortality. The design was a prospective observational cohort study. Patients were admitted to our intensive care burn unit with severe thermal burns (> or =20% total body surface area [BSA] burned) or inhalation injury with a delay from injury to admission less than 12 h and a length of stay less than 3 days (n = 439; age, 46.0 +/- 20.3 yrs; total BSA burned, 31.6% +/- 20.2% [mean +/- SD]; inhalation injury, 44.4%; crude mortality, 18.5%). Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores were measured on admission (SOFA 0) and on subsequent days (SOFA 1, SOFA 2, SOFA 3, and SOFA 4). The difference between SOFA 0 and SOFA 4 (DeltaSOFA 0-4) was calculated. Multivariate logistic regression analyses, including other variables associated with mortality in the models, were performed to calculate adjusted odds ratios (ORs) of organ dysfunction measurements for mortality. After adjusting for age, BSA burned, diagnosis of inhalation injury, and sex, SOFA 1 (OR, 1.89; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.55-2.32), SOFA 4 (OR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.19-1.47), and DeltaSOFA 0-4 (OR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.28-1.55) were independently associated with mortality. The SOFA score is useful to assess organ dysfunction in burn patients. Burn-induced organ dysfunction (early and late), as well as the change in organ dysfunction, is independently associated with mortality.

摘要

本研究的目的是通过使用序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分来评估烧伤患者的器官功能障碍,确定早期(第1天)和晚期(第4天)器官功能障碍之间的关系,以及从入院到第4天器官功能障碍的变化情况,还有死亡率。研究设计为前瞻性观察队列研究。患者因严重热烧伤(烧伤总面积[BSA]≥20%)或吸入性损伤入住我们的重症监护烧伤病房,受伤至入院延迟时间小于12小时,住院时间小于3天(n = 439;年龄,46.0±20.3岁;烧伤总面积,31.6%±20.2%[平均值±标准差];吸入性损伤,44.4%;粗死亡率,18.5%)。在入院时(SOFA 0)以及随后几天(SOFA 1、SOFA 2、SOFA 3和SOFA 4)测量序贯器官衰竭评估评分。计算SOFA 0和SOFA 4之间的差值(DeltaSOFA 0 - 4)。进行多变量逻辑回归分析,模型中纳入其他与死亡率相关的变量,以计算器官功能障碍测量值对死亡率的调整比值比(OR)。在调整年龄、烧伤总面积、吸入性损伤诊断和性别后,SOFA 1(OR,1.89;95%置信区间[CI],1.55 - 2.32)、SOFA 4(OR,1.33;95% CI,1.19 - 1.47)和DeltaSOFA 0 - 4(OR,1.40;95% CI,1.28 - 1.55)与死亡率独立相关。SOFA评分有助于评估烧伤患者的器官功能障碍。烧伤引起的器官功能障碍(早期和晚期)以及器官功能障碍的变化与死亡率独立相关。

相似文献

1
Organ dysfunction as estimated by the sequential organ failure assessment score is related to outcome in critically ill burn patients.序贯器官衰竭评估评分所评估的器官功能障碍与重症烧伤患者的预后相关。
Shock. 2009 Feb;31(2):125-31. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0b013e31817fc3ef.
2
The Multiple Organ Dysfunction Score (MODS) versus the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score in outcome prediction.多器官功能障碍评分(MODS)与序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分在预后预测中的比较。
Intensive Care Med. 2002 Nov;28(11):1619-24. doi: 10.1007/s00134-002-1491-3. Epub 2002 Sep 6.
3
Sequential organ failure assessment score as the determinant of outcome for patients with severe sepsis.序贯器官衰竭评估评分作为严重脓毒症患者预后的决定因素
Croat Med J. 2004 Dec;45(6):715-20.
4
SOFA is superior to MOD score for the determination of non-neurologic organ dysfunction in patients with severe traumatic brain injury: a cohort study.在严重创伤性脑损伤患者中,序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)在判定非神经器官功能障碍方面优于多器官功能不全评分(MOD):一项队列研究。
Crit Care. 2006;10(4):R115. doi: 10.1186/cc5007.
5
The impact of organ failures and their relationship with outcome in intensive care: analysis of a prospective multicentre database of adult admissions.器官衰竭的影响及其与重症监护结局的关系:对成人入院前瞻性多中心数据库的分析。
Anaesthesia. 2006 Aug;61(8):731-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2006.04707.x.
6
The prognostic value of the subjective assessment of peripheral perfusion in critically ill patients.危重症患者外周灌注主观评估的预后价值
Crit Care Med. 2009 Mar;37(3):934-8. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31819869db.
7
Organ system dysfunction following open cholecystectomy for acute acalculous cholecystitis in critically ill patients.危重症患者急性非结石性胆囊炎行开腹胆囊切除术后的器官系统功能障碍
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2006 Feb;50(2):173-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2006.00946.x.
8
Study of clinical course of organ dysfunction in intensive care.重症监护中器官功能障碍临床病程的研究
Crit Care Med. 2004 Feb;32(2):384-90. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000108881.14082.10.
9
[Prediction of prognosis of patients with multiple organ dysfunction syndrome by sepsis-related organ failure assessment].[脓毒症相关器官功能衰竭评估对多器官功能障碍综合征患者预后的预测]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2001 Jan 25;81(2):78-81.
10
Application of the sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score to bacteremic ICU patients.序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分在菌血症重症监护病房患者中的应用。
Infection. 2007 Jun;35(4):240-4. doi: 10.1007/s15010-007-6217-6. Epub 2007 Jul 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Sepsis in burn care: incidence and outcomes.烧伤护理中的脓毒症:发病率与转归
Mil Med Res. 2025 Sep 1;12(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s40779-025-00643-x.
2
Bioavailability of Reduced Coenzyme Q10 (Ubiquinol-10) in Burn Patients.烧伤患者中还原型辅酶Q10(泛醇-10)的生物利用度。
Metabolites. 2022 Jul 1;12(7):613. doi: 10.3390/metabo12070613.
3
Sepsis in Burns-Lessons Learnt from Developments in the Management of Septic Shock.烧伤脓毒症——从脓毒性休克治疗进展中得到的教训。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Dec 24;58(1):26. doi: 10.3390/medicina58010026.
4
The prognostic nutritional index on postoperative day one is associated with one-year mortality after burn surgery in elderly patients.老年患者烧伤手术后第一天的预后营养指数与一年死亡率相关。
Burns Trauma. 2021 Mar 1;9:tkaa043. doi: 10.1093/burnst/tkaa043. eCollection 2021 Jan.
5
A case series of concomitant burn and COVID-19.一系列烧伤合并新型冠状病毒肺炎的病例
Burns Open. 2021 Jan;5(1):34-38. doi: 10.1016/j.burnso.2020.11.003. Epub 2020 Dec 5.
6
Respiratory and coagulation dysfunctions on admission as independent predictors of in-hospital mortality in critically ill burn patients.入院时呼吸和凝血功能障碍是重症烧伤患者院内死亡的独立预测因素。
Ann Burns Fire Disasters. 2019 Jun 30;32(2):94-102.
7
Outcomes in Burn-Injured Patients Who Develop Sepsis.发生脓毒症的烧伤患者的预后
J Burn Care Res. 2019 Apr 26;40(3):269-273. doi: 10.1093/jbcr/irz017.
8
Continuously Updated Estimation of Heart Transplant Waitlist Mortality.不断更新的心脏移植候补者死亡率估计。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Aug 7;72(6):650-659. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.05.045.
9
Predictors of Early Onset Multiple Organ Dysfunction in Major Burn Patients with Ventilator Support: Experience from A Mass Casualty Explosion.重大烧伤患者机械通气支持后早期多器官功能障碍的预测因素:一起大规模爆炸事故中的经验。
Sci Rep. 2018 Jul 19;8(1):10939. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-29158-3.
10
Hyperphosphatemia is associated with high mortality in severe burns.高磷血症与严重烧伤患者的高死亡率相关。
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 9;13(1):e0190978. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190978. eCollection 2018.