Suppr超能文献

[三、四年级学童的低级听觉技能与书写技能比较:快速听觉处理缺陷理论的证据?]

[Low level auditory skills compared to writing skills in school children attending third and fourth grade: evidence for the rapid auditory processing deficit theory?].

作者信息

Ptok M, Meisen R

机构信息

Klinik und Poliklinik für Phoniatrie und Pädaudiologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover.

出版信息

Klin Padiatr. 2008 Mar-Apr;220(2):77-80. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-972571. Epub 2007 Aug 9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The rapid auditory processing defi-cit theory holds that impaired reading/writing skills are not caused exclusively by a cognitive deficit specific to representation and processing of speech sounds but arise due to sensory, mainly auditory, deficits. To further explore this theory we compared different measures of auditory low level skills to writing skills in school children.

DESIGN

prospective study.

SAMPLE

School children attending third and fourth grade.

DEPENDENT VARIABLES

just noticeable differences for intensity and frequency (JNDI, JNDF), gap detection (GD) monaural and binaural temporal order judgement (TOJb and TOJm); grade in writing, language and mathematics.

STATISTICS

correlation analysis.

RESULTS

No relevant correlation was found between any auditory low level processing variable and writing skills.

DISCUSSION

These data do not support the rapid auditory processing deficit theory.

摘要

背景

快速听觉加工缺陷理论认为,阅读/写作技能受损并非仅由语音表征和加工特有的认知缺陷所致,而是由感觉缺陷,主要是听觉缺陷引起的。为了进一步探究该理论,我们比较了学童听觉低水平技能的不同测量指标与写作技能。

设计

前瞻性研究。

样本

三、四年级学童。

因变量

强度和频率的恰可察觉差异(JNDI、JNDF)、间隙检测(GD)、单耳和双耳时间顺序判断(TOJb和TOJm);写作、语言和数学成绩。

统计方法

相关性分析。

结果

未发现任何听觉低水平加工变量与写作技能之间存在显著相关性。

讨论

这些数据不支持快速听觉加工缺陷理论。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验