Acevedo Beatriz
University of Bedfordshire, United Kingdom.
Int J Drug Policy. 2007 May;18(3):177-86. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2006.11.008. Epub 2007 Jan 2.
In January 2004 the British government announced that cannabis would be reclassified from Classes B to C, taking into account its level of harmfulness for human health and considering the penalties for possession and supplying. It was argued by the Government, that cannabis reclassification would save some resources and stop the criminalisation of otherwise law-abiding citizens. One year later, in 2005 the discussion about cannabis reclassification shifted from the argument about efficiency in the use of resources toward a debate about the effects of cannabis on mental health. The purpose of this article is to determine what happened between these two moments, and how the discussion originally formulated in terms of public management and efficiency became a matter of both mental health and criminality. Using a post-Structuralist approach, based on selected ideas from the French philosopher Michel Foucault, and supported by extensive research, this article proposes that the political decision regarding cannabis reclassification can be understood as part of the re-definition of the 'cannabis problem' and hence, the creation of a new type of 'cannabis user'. Although the debate took place in the United Kingdom, the main arguments can be extended to other reforms on cannabis legislation in other European countries.
2004年1月,英国政府宣布,考虑到大麻对人类健康的危害程度以及持有和供应大麻的处罚,将把大麻的分类从B类降至C类。政府认为,大麻重新分类将节省一些资源,并避免使原本守法的公民被定罪。一年后的2005年,关于大麻重新分类的讨论从资源使用效率的争论转向了关于大麻对心理健康影响的辩论。本文的目的是确定这两个时刻之间发生了什么,以及最初围绕公共管理和效率展开的讨论是如何变成一个涉及心理健康和犯罪行为的问题的。本文采用后结构主义方法,以法国哲学家米歇尔·福柯的某些观点为基础,并得到广泛研究的支持,提出关于大麻重新分类的政治决定可被理解为“大麻问题”重新定义的一部分,因此也是新型“大麻使用者”产生的一部分。尽管这场辩论发生在英国,但主要论点可扩展至其他欧洲国家关于大麻立法的其他改革。