Pilkington Hilary
Department of Sociology, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom.
Int J Drug Policy. 2007 May;18(3):213-24. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2006.08.003. Epub 2006 Sep 26.
The study of drug use by young people in the West has been transformed over the last decade by the development of sociological approaches to drug use which take serious account of the cultural context in which young people encounter drugs. One consequence is that the notion of 'peer pressure', as the primary articulation of the engagement between youth culture and drug use, has been displaced by that of 'normalisation', which envisages 'recreational' drug use as one expression of consumer-based youth cultural lifestyles. In stark contrast, academic discussion of drug use in Russia remains primarily concerned with the prevalence and health consequences of (intravenous) drug use while explanations of rising rates of drug use focus on structural factors related to the expansion of drugs supply and, to a lesser extent, post-Soviet social and economic dislocation. In this article, original empirical research in Russia is used to develop an understanding of young people's drug use that synthesises structural and cultural explanations of it. It does this by situating young people's narratives of their drugs choices in the context of local drugs markets and broader socio-economic processes. However, it attempts to go beyond seeing structural location as simply a 'constraint' on individual choice by adopting an understanding of 'youth culture' as a range of youth cultural practices and formations that simultaneously embody, reproduce and negotiate the structural locations of their subjects.
在过去十年中,西方对年轻人吸毒问题的研究因社会学吸毒研究方法的发展而发生了转变,这些方法认真考虑了年轻人接触毒品的文化背景。一个结果是,“同伴压力”这一概念,作为青年文化与吸毒之间关联的主要表述,已被“常态化”概念所取代,“常态化”将“娱乐性”吸毒视为以消费者为基础的青年文化生活方式的一种表现形式。与之形成鲜明对比的是,俄罗斯学术界对吸毒问题的讨论主要仍集中在(静脉注射)吸毒的流行程度和健康后果上,而对吸毒率上升的解释则侧重于与毒品供应扩张相关的结构因素,以及在较小程度上与后苏联时期的社会和经济混乱有关的因素。在本文中,利用俄罗斯的原创实证研究来深入理解年轻人的吸毒行为,这种理解综合了对其的结构和文化解释。具体做法是将年轻人对其毒品选择的叙述置于当地毒品市场和更广泛的社会经济进程的背景中。然而,它试图超越将结构位置仅仅视为对个人选择的“限制”,通过将“青年文化”理解为一系列青年文化实践和形式,这些实践和形式同时体现、再生产并协商其主体的结构位置。