Kozieradzka Anna, Kamiński Karol, Dobrzycki Sławomir, Nowak Konrad, Musiał Włodzimierz
Klinika Kardiologii, Akademia Medyczna, ul. M. Skłodowskiej-Curie 24a, 15-276 Białystok.
Kardiol Pol. 2007 Jul;65(7):788-95; discussion 796-7.
TIMI Risk Score for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) was developed in a cohort of patients treated with fibrinolysis. It was though to predict in-hospital and short-term prognosis. Later studies validated this approach in large cohorts of patients, regardless of the applied treatment and presented its good power to predict 30-day mortality.
We applied the TIMI Risk Score to our registry of STEMI patients treated with primary percutaneous intervention (pPCI) to validate the possibility to predict one-year survival.
Our registry comprised 494 consecutive patients (mean age 58.5+/-11.3 years) with STEMI treated with pPCI who were followed for approximately one year. STEMI was diagnosed based on typical criteria: chest pain, ECG changes and rise in myocardial necrosis markers. In all patients TIMI Risk Score for STEMI was calculated and they were divided into three groups: low risk (0-5 points), medium risk (6-7) and high risk (>7 points). Multivariate logistic regression analysis, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis with Cox and log-rank tests as well as c statistics from receiver-operator curves (ROC) were used for statistical analysis.
TIMI 3 flow was obtained in 95.5% of patients. Median TIMI risk score was 4 (ranging from 0 to 10). During follow-up there were 47 deaths (9.5%). There was a statistically significant difference in survival between all risk groups both in 30-day and one-year follow-up (p <0.001 log-rank test). TIMI Risk Score had good power to predict 30-day (c statistic 0.834, 95% CI 0.757-0.91, p <0.0001) as well as one-year mortality (c statistic 0.809, 95% CI 0.739-0.878, p <0.0001). Interestingly, when we excluded from the analysis all patients who died during the first 30 days, TIMI Risk score maintained its very good prognostic value. All analysed risk groups significantly differed between each other with respect to mortality (p <0.05, log-rank test) and the c statistic was 0.745 (95% CI 0.612-0.879, p <0.0002). In multivariate logistic regression analysis TIMI Risk Score was one of the independent risk factors of death during one-year follow-up (OR 1.59, p <0.001).
TIMI Risk Score accurately defines the population of STEMI patients who are at high risk of death not only during the first 30 days, but also during a long-term follow-up. This simple score should be included in the discharge letters because it contains very useful information for further care.
ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)的TIMI风险评分是在接受溶栓治疗的患者队列中制定的。它被认为可预测住院期间和短期预后。后来的研究在大量患者队列中验证了这种方法,无论采用何种治疗方法,并表明其具有良好的预测30天死亡率的能力。
我们将TIMI风险评分应用于接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(pPCI)的STEMI患者登记册,以验证预测一年生存率的可能性。
我们的登记册包括494例连续接受pPCI治疗的STEMI患者(平均年龄58.5±11.3岁),随访约一年。根据典型标准诊断STEMI:胸痛、心电图改变和心肌坏死标志物升高。计算所有患者的STEMI的TIMI风险评分,并将他们分为三组:低风险(0-5分)、中风险(6-7分)和高风险(>7分)。采用多因素逻辑回归分析、Cox和对数秩检验的Kaplan-Meier生存分析以及来自受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)的c统计量进行统计分析。
95.5%的患者获得TIMI 3级血流。TIMI风险评分中位数为4(范围为0至10)。随访期间有47例死亡(9.5%)。在30天和一年随访中,所有风险组之间的生存率存在统计学显著差异(对数秩检验p<0.001)。TIMI风险评分具有良好的预测30天(c统计量0.834,95%CI 0.757-0.91,p<0.0001)以及一年死亡率(c统计量0.809,95%CI 0.739-0.8