Cristofanilli Massimo, Valero Vicente, Buzdar Aman U, Kau Shu-Wan, Broglio Kristine R, Gonzalez-Angulo Ana Maria, Sneige Nour, Islam Rabiul, Ueno Naoto T, Buchholz Thomas A, Singletary Sonja E, Hortobagyi Gabriel N
Department of Breast Medical Oncology, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030, USA.
Cancer. 2007 Oct 1;110(7):1436-44. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22927.
BACKGROUND: Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is the most aggressive manifestation of primary breast cancer. The authors compared the prognostic features of IBC and non-IBC locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) to gain insight into the biology of this disease entity. METHODS: This retrospective analysis consisted of 1071 patients, comprising 240 patients with IBC and 831 patients with non-IBC LABC who were enrolled in 10 consecutive clinical trials (5 from each disease group). All patients received similar multidisciplinary treatment. The authors measured time to disease recurrence for each individual site from the start of treatment to the date of disease recurrence or last follow-up (recurrence-free survival) and overall survival rates to the date of last follow-up or death. RESULTS: The median follow-up period was 69 months (range, 1-367 months). Pathologically complete response rates were 13.9% and 11.7% in the IBC and non-IBC LABC groups, respectively (P = .42). The 5-year estimates of cumulative incidence of recurrence were 64.8 % and 43.4% (P < .0001), respectively, for IBC and non-IBC LABC. IBC had significantly higher cumulative incidence of locoregional recurrence and distant soft-tissue and bone disease. The 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was 40.5% for the IBC group (95% CI, 34.5%-47.4%) and 63.2% for the non-IBC LABC group (95% CI, 60.0%-66.6%; P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: IBC was associated with a worse prognosis and a distinctive pattern of early recurrence compared with LABC. These data suggested that investigating factors affecting "homing" of cancer cells may provide novel treatment strategies for IBC.
背景:炎性乳腺癌(IBC)是原发性乳腺癌最具侵袭性的表现形式。作者比较了IBC和非IBC局部晚期乳腺癌(LABC)的预后特征,以深入了解这种疾病实体的生物学特性。 方法:这项回顾性分析纳入了1071例患者,其中包括240例IBC患者和831例非IBC LABC患者,这些患者来自连续的10项临床试验(每个疾病组各5项)。所有患者均接受了相似的多学科治疗。作者测量了从治疗开始到疾病复发日期或最后随访日期(无复发生存期)每个个体部位的疾病复发时间,以及到最后随访或死亡日期的总生存率。 结果:中位随访期为69个月(范围1 - 367个月)。IBC组和非IBC LABC组的病理完全缓解率分别为13.9%和11.7%(P = 0.42)。IBC和非IBC LABC的5年复发累积发生率估计分别为64.8%和43.4%(P < 0.0001)。IBC的局部区域复发以及远处软组织和骨疾病的累积发生率显著更高。IBC组的5年总生存率为40.5%(95%CI,34.5% - 47.4%),非IBC LABC组为63.2%(95%CI,60.0% - 66.6%;P < 0.0001)。 结论:与LABC相比,IBC的预后更差,且具有独特的早期复发模式。这些数据表明,研究影响癌细胞“归巢”的因素可能为IBC提供新的治疗策略。
Clin Cancer Res. 2008-3-15
Acta Chir Belg. 2005-2
JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2025-4-30
Int J Mol Sci. 2023-2-28