Krause Felix, Jepsen Søren, Braun Andreas
Department of Operative and Preventive Dentistry, University of Bonn, Welschnonnenstrasse 17, 53111 Bonn, Germany.
Eur J Oral Sci. 2007 Aug;115(4):252-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2007.00456.x.
Laser fluorescence measurements have been shown to be well suited for caries diagnosis. The aim of this study was to compare two laser fluorescence devices and to correlate the respective values with the visual and radiographic assessment and with the extent of the carious lesion. Ninety-four clinically non-cavitated occlusal carious lesions in the premolars and molars of 82 patients were examined. Laser fluorescence values on the surface were measured with a conventional laser fluorescence system and a novel laser fluorescence pen device. When operative intervention at a site was indicated, the extent of caries was determined after its removal. Readings obtained with both systems were significantly different with an interdevice factor of 0.64. Sensitivity and specificity for operative care were 92.6% and 53.7%, respectively, for the conventional, and 88.9% and 53.7%, respectively, for the pen device. For both devices, a correlation between laser fluorescence values and the visual and radiographic assessment and with the extent of the lesion was shown. The study indicates that the novel laser fluorescence device seems to be suitable for occlusal caries diagnosis. However, proposed guidelines for the clinical use of laser fluorescence readings of the conventional device cannot be transferred to the novel pen system.
激光荧光测量已被证明非常适合龋齿诊断。本研究的目的是比较两种激光荧光设备,并将各自的值与视觉和放射学评估以及龋损范围相关联。对82例患者的前磨牙和磨牙中的94个临床无龋洞的咬合面龋损进行了检查。使用传统的激光荧光系统和新型激光荧光笔设备测量表面的激光荧光值。当某一部位需要进行手术干预时,在去除龋损后确定龋损范围。两种系统获得的读数存在显著差异,设备间因素为0.64。传统设备对手术治疗的敏感性和特异性分别为92.6%和53.7%,笔式设备分别为88.9%和53.7%。对于这两种设备,均显示出激光荧光值与视觉和放射学评估以及病变范围之间存在相关性。该研究表明,新型激光荧光设备似乎适用于咬合面龋齿诊断。然而,针对传统设备激光荧光读数临床应用提出的指导原则不能应用于新型笔式系统。