Li J B, Xiong Y C, Wang X L, Fan X H, Li Y, Xu H, Ma Y, Deng X M
Department of Anaesthesia, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China.
Anaesthesia. 2007 Sep;62(9):940-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2007.05182.x.
The TruView EVO2 laryngoscope was compared with the traditional Macintosh laryngoscope in 200 patients who required tracheal intubation for elective surgery. Mallampati score determined prior to laryngoscopy was significantly related to the view of the glottis during laryngoscopy for both laryngoscopes. The view of the larynx was better with the TruView EVO2 laryngoscope than with the Macintosh laryngoscope in patients with a Cormack and Lehane grade greater than 1 (p < 0.01). The mean time to intubate was significantly shorter with the Macintosh laryngoscope (34 s) than with the TruView laryngoscope (51 s) (p < 0.01).
在200例因择期手术需要气管插管的患者中，对TruView EVO2喉镜与传统的麦金托什喉镜进行了比较。喉镜检查前确定的马兰帕蒂评分与两种喉镜在喉镜检查期间声门的视野显著相关。对于科马克和莱哈尼分级大于1级的患者，TruView EVO2喉镜的喉部视野优于麦金托什喉镜（p<0.01）。麦金托什喉镜的平均插管时间（34秒）明显短于TruView喉镜（51秒）（p<0.01）。
