Meinzer Marcus, Streiftau Silke, Rockstroh Brigitte
Department of Clinical Psychology and Neuropsychology, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany.
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2007 Sep;13(5):846-53. doi: 10.1017/S1355617707071111.
Intense language training has been found to be more efficient in the rehabilitation of chronic aphasia than treatment spread across time. Intense treatment, however, challenges personnel and financial resources of the health care system. The present study examined, whether laypersons can be trained to apply standardized language training for chronic aphasia with effects comparable to training by experts. Twenty individuals with chronic aphasia participated in the training, Constraint-Induced Aphasia Therapy (CIAT), which comprises communicative language games with increasing level of difficulty in a motivating context for 3 hr/day on 10 consecutive days. Following a random-control design, training was applied either by experienced therapists (n=10) or trained laypersons (n=10). Standardized language assessments revealed significant within-group improvements, however, between-group differences were not present. We conclude that a standardized training program, such as CIAT, can be efficiently accomplished by trained laypersons with results comparable to that of experienced therapists.
研究发现,强化语言训练在慢性失语症康复中比分散在不同时间的治疗更有效。然而,强化治疗对医疗保健系统的人员和财政资源构成挑战。本研究探讨了外行人是否可以接受培训,以应用标准化语言训练治疗慢性失语症,其效果与专家培训相当。20名慢性失语症患者参加了约束诱导失语症治疗(CIAT)培训,该培训包括在激励环境中进行难度逐渐增加的交际语言游戏,每天3小时,连续10天。按照随机对照设计,培训由经验丰富的治疗师(n = 10)或经过培训的外行人(n = 10)进行。标准化语言评估显示组内有显著改善,但组间差异不存在。我们得出结论,标准化培训方案,如CIAT,可以由经过培训的外行人有效完成,其结果与经验丰富的治疗师相当。