Lewin Andrew, Lipetz Robert, Wu Jacqueline, Schwartz Sherwyn
National Research Institute, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Encompass Clinical Research, Spring Valley, California, USA.
Clin Ther. 2007 May;29(5):844-855. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.05.013.
Metformin is widely used in the management of type 2 diabetes, either as monotherapy or in combination with other oral antihyperglycemic agents such as sulfonylureas and thiazolidinediones. Combination treatment with metformin and sulfonylurea in patients who failed monotherapy has been reported to be effective in maintaining glycemic control.
The purpose for this study was to compare the efficacy and tolerability of extended-release metformin (MER) administered with a sulfonylurea (glyburide) to sulfonylurea monotherapy in patients with type 2 diabetes.
This multicenter, double-blind, randomized, controlled study enrolled adult patients with type 2 diabetes who were either drug naive or previously treated with oral diabetic medications and who had not achieved glycemic control. Patients were stabilized on sulfonylurea (10 mg/d for 2 weeks, then 15 mg/d for 4 weeks) then randomly assigned at base line to receive MER (1500 mg QD, 1000 mg BID, or 2000 mg QD) plus sulfonylurea (MER+S) or sulfonylurea monotherapy for 24 weeks. Patients were evaluated every 1 to 2 weeks during sulfonylurea stabilization and initial metformin treatment, and then every 4 weeks until study end. The primary efficacy end point was glycemic control as determined by changes in glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA(1c)) from baseline to study end between those receiving combination MER+S treatment and those receiving sulfonylurea monotherapy. Adverse events (AEs) were recorded throughout the study by direct questioning, self-reporting by patients, and from the results of physical examinations and clinical laboratory tests.
A total of 741 patients were enrolled. Of these, 134 patients were stabilization failures, 607 patients were randomized, 575 patients received treatment and were included in the intent-to-treat population, and 417 patients completed the study per protocol. There were no significant differences between treatment groups for any demographic or baseline characteristics (all patients: mean [SD] age, 53.0 [10.6] years; male sex, 54.6% [314/575]; race, white, 58.8% [338/575], Hispanic, 28.5% [164/575]; mean [SD] weight, 97.0 [22.2] kg; obese [body mass index > or =30 kg/m(2)], 69.4% [399/575] ). There were significant decreases from baseline in mean fasting plasma glucose (FPG) levels by the end of week 1 and in mean HbA(1c) levels by week 8 in each MER+S group (both, P < 0.001). The mean (95% CI) changes from baseline to study end in the combined MER+S groups (HbA(1c), -0.74% [-0.85% to -0.64%]; FPG, -12.9 [-17.1 to -8.7] mg/dL) were significantly different from the sulfonylurea monotherapy group (HbA(1c), 0.08% [-0.08% to 0.25%]; FPG, 15.5 [8.2 to 22.8] mg/dL; P < 0.001). Among patients treated with MER+S, the mean (SEM) change in HbA(1c) was -1.26% (-1.44% to -1.07%) for drugnaive patients and -0.59% (-0.46% to 0.71%) for patients previously treated with metformin. There was a significant difference between treatment groups with regard to the prevalence of hypoglycemia (MER+S groups, 11.6% vs sulfonylurea monotherapy group, 4.2%; P = 0.007), but no significant difference was observed for gastrointestinal events. The most common gastrointestinal AEs were diarrhea and nausea (8.6% and 3.9%, respectively, in the combined MER+S groups; 2.8% and 1.4%, respectively, in the sulfonylurea monotherapy group).
The combination of QD or BID treatment with MER+S was significantly more effective in lowering HbA(1c) and glucose levels than sulfonylurea monotherapy in these adult patients with type 2 diabetes. However, a significant increase in the prevalence of hypoglycemia was observed in the MER+S treatment groups compared with the sulfonylurea monotherapy group.
二甲双胍广泛用于2型糖尿病的治疗,可作为单药治疗或与其他口服降糖药如磺脲类和噻唑烷二酮类联合使用。据报道,在单药治疗失败的患者中,二甲双胍与磺脲类联合治疗在维持血糖控制方面有效。
本研究旨在比较缓释二甲双胍(MER)与磺脲类药物(格列本脲)联合使用与磺脲类单药治疗对2型糖尿病患者的疗效和耐受性。
这项多中心、双盲、随机、对照研究纳入了2型糖尿病成年患者,这些患者要么未接受过药物治疗,要么之前接受过口服降糖药治疗但血糖控制不佳。患者先使用磺脲类药物稳定治疗(10mg/d,持续2周,然后15mg/d,持续4周),然后在基线时随机分配接受MER(1500mg每日一次、1000mg每日两次或2000mg每日一次)加磺脲类药物(MER+S)或磺脲类单药治疗24周。在磺脲类药物稳定治疗和初始二甲双胍治疗期间,每1至2周对患者进行评估,然后每4周评估一次,直至研究结束。主要疗效终点是糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)从基线到研究结束时的变化所确定的血糖控制情况,比较接受MER+S联合治疗的患者和接受磺脲类单药治疗的患者。在整个研究过程中,通过直接询问、患者自我报告以及体格检查和临床实验室检查结果记录不良事件(AE)。
共纳入741例患者。其中,134例患者稳定治疗失败,607例患者被随机分组,575例患者接受治疗并纳入意向性治疗人群,417例患者按方案完成研究。各治疗组在任何人口统计学或基线特征方面均无显著差异(所有患者:平均[标准差]年龄,53.0[10.6]岁;男性,54.6%[314/575];种族,白人,58.8%[338/575],西班牙裔,28.5%[164/575];平均[标准差]体重,97.0[22.2]kg;肥胖[体重指数≥30kg/m²],69.4%[399/575])。在每个MER+S组中,到第1周结束时平均空腹血糖(FPG)水平和到第8周时平均HbA1c水平均较基线有显著下降(均P<0.001)。MER+S联合组从基线到研究结束时的平均(95%CI)变化(HbA1c,-0.74%[-0.85%至-0.64%];FPG,-12.9[-17.1至-8.7]mg/dL)与磺脲类单药治疗组(HbA1c,0.08%[-0.08%至0.25%];FPG,15.5[8.2至22.8]mg/dL;P<0.001)有显著差异。在接受MER+S治疗的患者中,初治患者HbA1c的平均(SEM)变化为-1.26%(-1.44%至-1.07%),之前接受过二甲双胍治疗的患者为-0.59%(-0.46%至0.71%)。治疗组之间低血糖患病率存在显著差异(MER+S组为11.6%,磺脲类单药治疗组为4.2%;P=0.0