Pranovi Fabio, Da Ponte Filippo, Torricelli Patrizia
Dipartimento di Scienze Ambientali, Università Ca' Foscari, Castello 2737/B, 30170 Venice, Italy.
Mar Pollut Bull. 2007 Oct;54(10):1607-18. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2007.06.010. Epub 2007 Aug 14.
In the context of the application of WFD, a scientific debate is growing about the applicability of biotic indices in coastal and transitional waters. In the present work, the question about the discriminating power of different biotic indices and the relationships with the structure and functioning of the macrobenthic community in a transitional environment is discussed. A time series of samples collected during the last 70 years in the lagoon of Venice, reflecting different environmental conditions (a sort of 'pristine state' in 1935, the distrophic crisis in 1988 and subsequent modifications in 1990, the invasion by an alien species and the developing of high impacting fishery in 1999) has been used. The comparison of results obtained by applying different biotic indices, such as AMBI, Bentix and BOPA, shows differences in the discriminating power of indices and a general overestimation of environmental conditions. Discrepancies between environmental status as indicated by biotic indices and the structure and functioning of the benthic community have been highlighted.
在水框架指令(WFD)的应用背景下,关于生物指数在沿海和过渡水域的适用性的科学争论日益激烈。在本研究中,探讨了不同生物指数的判别能力以及与过渡环境中大型底栖动物群落结构和功能的关系问题。利用了过去70年在威尼斯潟湖采集的一系列样本,这些样本反映了不同的环境状况(1935年的某种“原始状态”、1988年的富营养化危机以及1990年的后续变化、1999年外来物种的入侵和高强度渔业的发展)。应用不同生物指数(如AMBI、Bentix和BOPA)所获得结果的比较表明,各指数在判别能力上存在差异,并且对环境状况普遍存在高估。生物指数所表明的环境状况与底栖动物群落结构和功能之间的差异已得到凸显。