• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性冠状动脉综合征后的糖尿病与死亡率

Diabetes and mortality following acute coronary syndromes.

作者信息

Donahoe Sean M, Stewart Garrick C, McCabe Carolyn H, Mohanavelu Satishkumar, Murphy Sabina A, Cannon Christopher P, Antman Elliott M

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Cornell University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.

出版信息

JAMA. 2007 Aug 15;298(7):765-75. doi: 10.1001/jama.298.7.765.

DOI:10.1001/jama.298.7.765
PMID:17699010
Abstract

CONTEXT

The worldwide epidemic of diabetes mellitus is increasing the burden of cardiovascular disease, the leading cause of death among persons with diabetes. The independent effect of diabetes on mortality following acute coronary syndromes (ACS) is uncertain.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the influence of diabetes on mortality following ACS using a large database spanning the full spectrum of ACS.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: A subgroup analysis of patients with diabetes enrolled in randomized clinical trials that evaluated ACS therapies. Patients with ACS in 11 independent Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) Study Group clinical trials from 1997 to 2006 were pooled, including 62,036 patients (46,577 with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction [STEMI] and 15,459 with unstable angina/non-STEMI [UA/NSTEMI]), of whom 10 613 (17.1%) had diabetes. A multivariable model was constructed to adjust for baseline characteristics, aspects of ACS presentation, and treatments for the ACS event.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Mortality at 30 days and 1 year following ACS among patients with diabetes vs patients without diabetes.

RESULTS

Mortality at 30 days was significantly higher among patients with diabetes than without diabetes presenting with UA/NSTEMI (2.1% vs 1.1%, P < .001) and STEMI (8.5% vs 5.4%, P < .001). After adjusting for baseline characteristics and features and management of the ACS event, diabetes was independently associated with higher 30-day mortality after UA/NSTEMI (odds ratio [OR], 1.78; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.24-2.56) or STEMI (OR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.24-1.57). Diabetes at presentation with ACS was associated with significantly higher mortality 1 year after UA/NSTEMI (hazard ratio [HR], 1.65; 95% CI, 1.30-2.10) or STEMI (HR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.08-1.38). By 1 year following ACS, patients with diabetes presenting with UA/NSTEMI had a risk of death that approached patients without diabetes presenting with STEMI (7.2% vs 8.1%).

CONCLUSION

Despite modern therapies for ACS, diabetes confers a significant adverse prognosis, which highlights the importance of aggressive strategies to manage this high-risk population with unstable ischemic heart disease.

摘要

背景

全球糖尿病流行正增加心血管疾病负担,而心血管疾病是糖尿病患者的主要死因。糖尿病对急性冠脉综合征(ACS)后死亡率的独立影响尚不确定。

目的

利用涵盖全谱ACS的大型数据库评估糖尿病对ACS后死亡率的影响。

设计、设置和患者:对参与评估ACS治疗的随机临床试验的糖尿病患者进行亚组分析。汇总了1997年至2006年11项独立的心肌梗死溶栓(TIMI)研究组临床试验中的ACS患者,包括62036例患者(46577例ST段抬高型心肌梗死[STEMI]和15459例不稳定型心绞痛/非STEMI[UA/NSTEMI]),其中10613例(17.1%)患有糖尿病。构建多变量模型以调整基线特征、ACS表现方面以及ACS事件的治疗情况。

主要结局指标

糖尿病患者与非糖尿病患者ACS后30天和1年的死亡率。

结果

患有UA/NSTEMI的糖尿病患者30天死亡率显著高于非糖尿病患者(2.1%对1.1%,P<.001),患有STEMI的糖尿病患者30天死亡率也显著高于非糖尿病患者(8.5%对5.4%,P<.001)。在调整基线特征、ACS事件的特点及管理后,糖尿病与UA/NSTEMI(比值比[OR],1.78;95%置信区间[CI],1.24 - 2.56)或STEMI(OR,1.40;95%CI,1.24 - 1.57)后30天较高死亡率独立相关。ACS发病时患有糖尿病与UA/NSTEMI(风险比[HR],1.65;95%CI,1.30 - 2.10)或STEMI(HR,1.22;95%CI,1.08 - 1.38)后1年显著较高死亡率相关。到ACS后1年时,患有UA/NSTEMI的糖尿病患者的死亡风险接近患有STEMI的非糖尿病患者(7.2%对8.1%)。

结论

尽管有针对ACS的现代治疗方法,但糖尿病仍带来显著不良预后,这凸显了积极策略管理这一不稳定缺血性心脏病高危人群的重要性。

相似文献

1
Diabetes and mortality following acute coronary syndromes.急性冠状动脉综合征后的糖尿病与死亡率
JAMA. 2007 Aug 15;298(7):765-75. doi: 10.1001/jama.298.7.765.
2
Comparison of long-term mortality across the spectrum of acute coronary syndromes.急性冠状动脉综合征各类型的长期死亡率比较。
Am Heart J. 2006 May;151(5):1065-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2005.05.019.
3
Patterns of presentation and outcomes of patients with acute coronary syndromes.急性冠状动脉综合征患者的临床表现模式及预后
Cardiology. 2009;113(3):198-206. doi: 10.1159/000201273. Epub 2009 Feb 11.
4
Early cardiac catheterization is associated with lower mortality only among high-risk patients with ST- and non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: observations from the OPUS-TIMI 16 trial.早期心脏导管插入术仅在伴有ST段和非ST段抬高急性冠脉综合征的高危患者中与较低死亡率相关:来自OPUS-TIMI 16试验的观察结果
Am Heart J. 2005 Feb;149(2):275-83. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2004.05.055.
5
Comparison of long-term mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients treated for acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction versus those with unstable and stable angina pectoris.急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者与不稳定型和稳定型心绞痛患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的长期死亡率比较。
Am J Cardiol. 2009 Aug 1;104(3):333-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.03.052. Epub 2009 Jun 6.
6
Improved in-hospital outcomes in acute coronary syndromes (unstable angina/non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction) despite similar TIMI risk scores.尽管急性冠状动脉综合征(不稳定型心绞痛/非ST段抬高型心肌梗死)患者的心肌梗死溶栓治疗(TIMI)风险评分相似,但住院结局仍有所改善。
J Invasive Cardiol. 2003 Sep;15(9):502-6.
7
One-year health status outcomes of unstable angina versus myocardial infarction: a prospective, observational cohort study of ACS survivors.不稳定型心绞痛与心肌梗死的一年健康状况结局:一项对急性冠状动脉综合征幸存者的前瞻性观察队列研究。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2007 Sep 12;7:28. doi: 10.1186/1471-2261-7-28.
8
Nationwide trends in acute coronary syndrome by subtype in New Zealand 2006-2016.新西兰 2006-2016 年急性冠状动脉综合征亚型的全国趋势。
Heart. 2020 Feb;106(3):221-227. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2019-315655. Epub 2019 Oct 31.
9
Polish Registry of Acute Coronary Syndromes (PL-ACS). Characteristics, treatments and outcomes of patients with acute coronary syndromes in Poland.波兰急性冠状动脉综合征注册研究(PL-ACS)。波兰急性冠状动脉综合征患者的特征、治疗及预后。
Kardiol Pol. 2007 Aug;65(8):861-72; discussion 873-4.
10
Impact of Clinical Presentation (Stable Angina Pectoris vs Unstable Angina Pectoris or Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction vs ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction) on Long-Term Outcomes in Women Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Drug-Eluting Stents.临床表现(稳定型心绞痛与不稳定型心绞痛或非ST段抬高型心肌梗死与ST段抬高型心肌梗死)对接受药物洗脱支架经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的女性长期预后的影响。
Am J Cardiol. 2015 Sep 15;116(6):845-52. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.06.010. Epub 2015 Jun 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of diabetes mellitus type-2 on the outcomes following mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER): A meta-analysis.2型糖尿病对经导管二尖瓣缘对缘修复术(TEER)术后结局的影响:一项荟萃分析。
Am Heart J Plus. 2025 Jul 8;57:100574. doi: 10.1016/j.ahjo.2025.100574. eCollection 2025 Sep.
2
Impact of diabetes and ejection fraction on non-ST-Segment elevation myocardial infarction outcomes.糖尿病和射血分数对非ST段抬高型心肌梗死预后的影响。
Heart Vessels. 2025 Jun 23. doi: 10.1007/s00380-025-02564-0.
3
Comparative evaluation of machine learning models versus TIMI score in ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction patients.
机器学习模型与TIMI评分在ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者中的比较评估
Indian Heart J. 2025 May-Jun;77(3):133-141. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2025.03.010. Epub 2025 Mar 27.
4
Glycemic control after aortic valve replacement: A retrospective study.主动脉瓣置换术后的血糖控制:一项回顾性研究。
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2025 Jan 2;56:101596. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2024.101596. eCollection 2025 Feb.
5
Bridging the Gap Between Diabetes and Cardiovascular Disease: A Comparative Review of Different Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 (GLP-1) Agonists: Efficacy, Safety, and Patient Outcomes.弥合糖尿病与心血管疾病之间的差距:不同胰高血糖素样肽-1(GLP-1)激动剂的比较综述:疗效、安全性及患者预后
Cureus. 2024 Nov 24;16(11):e74345. doi: 10.7759/cureus.74345. eCollection 2024 Nov.
6
Circulating Factors as Potential Biomarkers of Cardiovascular Damage Progression Associated with Type 2 Diabetes.循环因子作为2型糖尿病相关心血管损伤进展的潜在生物标志物。
Proteomes. 2024 Oct 11;12(4):29. doi: 10.3390/proteomes12040029.
7
Addressing disparities in the long-term mortality risk in individuals with non-ST segment myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) by diabetes mellitus status: a nationwide cohort study.针对伴有非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(NSTEMI)的个体中糖尿病状态对长期死亡率风险差异的处理:一项全国性队列研究。
Diabetologia. 2024 Dec;67(12):2711-2725. doi: 10.1007/s00125-024-06281-7. Epub 2024 Oct 3.
8
On-Pump or Off-Pump Impact of Diabetic Patient Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting 5-Year Clinical Outcomes.糖尿病患者冠状动脉旁路移植术的体外循环或非体外循环对5年临床结局的影响
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Sep 24;25(9):349. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2509349. eCollection 2024 Sep.
9
Glucose-Lowering Drugs with Proven Cardiovascular Benefit Following Acute Coronary Syndrome in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: Treatment Gaps and Outcomes.2型糖尿病患者急性冠状动脉综合征后具有已证实心血管益处的降糖药物:治疗差距与结局
J Clin Med. 2024 Sep 19;13(18):5541. doi: 10.3390/jcm13185541.
10
Timing of coronary artery bypass grafting after myocardial infarction influences late survival.心肌梗死后冠状动脉搭桥术的时机影响晚期生存率。
JTCVS Open. 2024 May 23;20:40-48. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2024.05.008. eCollection 2024 Aug.