Port Friedrich K, Pisoni Ronald L, Bommer Jürgen, Locatelli Francesco, Jadoul Michel, Eknoyan Garabed, Kurokawa Kiyoshi, Canaud Bernard J, Finley Miles P, Young Eric W
University Renal Research and Education Association, 315 W. Huron Street, Suite 360, Ann Arbor, MI 48103, USA.
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006 Mar;1(2):246-55. doi: 10.2215/CJN.01050905. Epub 2006 Feb 1.
The international Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS) is well suited to evaluate levels of deviation from emerging and established guidelines to clinical practice of hemodialysis, over time and by country. The DOPPS can also evaluate whether the target levels that are chosen in the guidelines are in agreement with outcomes such as elevated risk for mortality, hospitalization, and vascular access failure. At a special DOPPS symposium during the 2004 congress of the American Society of Nephrology, the authors presented such findings; key points from that symposium are presented in this article, focusing on vascular access, mineral metabolism, dialysis dose, and anemia management. Although an observational study cannot prove causality, DOPPS suggests large opportunities to improve care and outcomes of dialysis patients. The international perspective of DOPPS assists in the new efforts for international guidelines. Some encouraging trends in recent years are documented in these areas.
国际透析结局与实践模式研究(DOPPS)非常适合评估随着时间推移以及不同国家,血液透析临床实践与新出现和既定指南之间的偏差程度。DOPPS还可以评估指南中选定的目标水平是否与死亡率升高、住院率升高以及血管通路失败等结果相符。在2004年美国肾脏病学会大会期间举行的一次特别的DOPPS研讨会上,作者展示了此类研究结果;本文介绍了该研讨会的要点,重点关注血管通路、矿物质代谢、透析剂量和贫血管理。尽管观察性研究无法证明因果关系,但DOPPS表明改善透析患者护理和结局存在很大机会。DOPPS的国际视角有助于推动国际指南的新努力。近年来在这些领域记录了一些令人鼓舞的趋势。