Scales Lucy H, McEwen Irene R, Murray Cynthia
J. D. McCarty Center, Norman, Oklahoma 73070, USA.
Pediatr Phys Ther. 2007 Fall;19(3):196-202. doi: 10.1097/PEP.0b013e3180cabc57.
This study compared parents' perceptions of benefits of a therapist's direct intervention with intervention designed to teach parents to promote their children's motor development.
Twenty-two mothers and one father of children with disabilities watched four videotapes. Two videotapes showed a physical therapist helping a child learn to sit or walk while the mother watched; two showed a therapist instructing a mother while the mother interacted with the child. Parents then responded to a 12-item questionnaire.
Overall, participants rated the parent instruction approach as more beneficial, but more stressful, than direct intervention.
Most results were inconsistent with previous reports that parents believed direct intervention was more beneficial than other approaches. The parents' belief that direct intervention could be less stressful is consistent with previous studies. Research is needed to identify the most effective model that parents prefer to promote children's motor development.
本研究比较了家长对治疗师直接干预的益处的看法，以及旨在教导家长促进其子女运动发育的干预措施的看法。
22名残疾儿童的母亲和1名父亲观看了四盘录像带。两盘录像带展示了一名物理治疗师在母亲观看时帮助一名儿童学习坐或走的过程；另外两盘录像带展示了治疗师在母亲与儿童互动时指导母亲的过程。家长随后回答了一份包含12个条目的问卷。
总体而言，参与者认为家长指导方法比直接干预更有益，但压力也更大。
大多数结果与之前的报告不一致，之前的报告称家长认为直接干预比其他方法更有益。家长认为直接干预压力较小这一观点与之前的研究一致。需要开展研究以确定家长更倾向的促进儿童运动发育的最有效模式。
