Carvalho Eurípedes Balsanufo, Cecílio Luiz Carlos de Oliveira
Hospital do Servidor Público Estadual de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brasil.
Cad Saude Publica. 2007 Sep;23(9):2167-77. doi: 10.1590/s0102-311x2007000900024.
This paper reconstructs the dispute between the main social actors with direct interests in the regulation of private health care in Brazil during the period immediately prior to the passage of Act 9.656/98, highlighting the divergences between these actors in relation to 28 central topics for shaping the regulatory framework prevailing in the country since 1998. The material used in the description and systematization of the positions in the regulatory dispute resulted from an empirical, descriptive, comparative study based on document analysis and interviews with key actors. The study systematizes the main points of controversy and consensus among the various actors, particularly highlighting the many points of agreement between proposals by medical organizations and those of users' organizations and consumer defense institutes, thereby suggesting the possibility of establishing an ethical and political bloc committed to the defense of improved health care as opposed to sheer market logic.
本文重构了在第9656/98号法案通过之前巴西私立医疗保健监管中具有直接利益的主要社会行为体之间的争议,突出了这些行为体在塑造自1998年以来该国现行监管框架的28个核心议题上的分歧。用于描述和系统化监管争议中各方立场的材料来自一项基于文献分析和对关键行为体访谈的实证、描述性比较研究。该研究系统化了各行为体之间争议和共识的要点,特别强调了医疗组织提案与用户组织及消费者保护机构提案之间的诸多一致之处,从而表明有可能建立一个致力于捍卫改善医疗保健而非单纯市场逻辑的伦理和政治联盟。