Hermida Ramón C
Bioengineering & Chronobiology Laboratories, University of Vigo, Campus Universitario, Vigo, Pontevedra 36200, Spain.
Chronobiol Int. 2007;24(4):749-75. doi: 10.1080/07420520701535837.
Ambulatory blood pressure (BP) measurements (ABPM) correlate more closely with target organ damage and cardiovascular events than clinical cuff measurements. ABPM reveals the significant circadian variation in BP, which in most individuals presents a morning increase, small post-prandial decline, and more extensive lowering during nocturnal rest. However, under certain pathophysiological conditions, the nocturnal BP decline may be reduced (non-dipper pattern) or even reversed (riser pattern). This is clinically relevant because the non-dipper and riser circadian BP patterns constitute a risk factor for left ventricular hypertrophy, microalbuminuria, cerebrovascular disease, congestive heart failure, vascular dementia, and myocardial infarction. Hence, there is growing interest in how to best tailor and individualize the treatment of hypertension according to the specific circadian BP pattern of each patient. All previous trials that have demonstrated an increased cardiovascular risk in non-dipper as compared to dipper patients have relied on the prognostic significance of a single ABPM baseline profile from each participant without accounting for possible changes in the BP pattern during follow-up. Moreover, the potential benefit (i.e., reduction in cardiovascular risk) associated with the normalization of the circadian BP variability (conversion from non-dipper to dipper pattern) from an appropriately envisioned treatment strategy is still a matter of debate. Accordingly, the MAPEC (Monitorización Ambulatoria de la Presión Arterial y Eventos Cardiovasculares, i.e., Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring and Cardiovascular Events) study was designed to investigate whether the normalization of the circadian BP profile toward more of a dipper pattern by chronotherapeutic strategies (i.e., specific timing during the 24 h of BP-lowering medications according to the 24 h BP pattern) reduces cardiovascular risk. The prospective MAPEC study investigates 3,000 diurnally active men and women >/=18 yrs of age. At inclusion, BP and wrist activity are measured for 48 h. The initial evaluation also includes a detailed medical history, an electrocardiogram, and screening laboratory blood and urine tests. The same evaluation procedure is scheduled yearly or more frequently (quarterly) if treatment adjustment is required for BP control. Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality are thus evaluated on the basis of changes in BP during follow-up. The MAPEC study, now on its fourth year of follow-up, investigates the potential decrease in cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, and renal risk from the proper modeling of the circadian BP profile by the timed administration (chronotherapy) of antihypertensive medication, beyond the reduction of clinic-determined daytime or ABPM-determined 24 h mean BP levels.
动态血压测量(ABPM)与靶器官损害及心血管事件的相关性比临床袖带测量更为密切。ABPM揭示了血压显著的昼夜变化,大多数个体表现为早晨血压升高、餐后小幅下降以及夜间休息时血压更显著降低。然而,在某些病理生理条件下,夜间血压下降可能会减少(非勺型模式)甚至逆转(反勺型模式)。这在临床上具有重要意义,因为非勺型和反勺型昼夜血压模式是左心室肥厚、微量白蛋白尿、脑血管疾病、充血性心力衰竭、血管性痴呆和心肌梗死的危险因素。因此人们越来越关注如何根据每位患者特定的昼夜血压模式,最好地调整高血压治疗方案并实现个体化治疗。以往所有表明非勺型患者心血管风险高于勺型患者的试验,都依赖于每位参与者单次ABPM基线数据的预后意义,而未考虑随访期间血压模式可能发生的变化。此外,通过适当的治疗策略使昼夜血压变异性正常化(从非勺型转变为勺型模式)所带来的潜在益处(即降低心血管风险)仍存在争议。因此,MAPEC(动态血压监测与心血管事件研究)旨在研究通过时间治疗策略(即根据24小时血压模式在特定时间服用降压药物)使昼夜血压模式向更接近勺型模式转变是否能降低心血管风险。MAPEC前瞻性研究纳入了3000名年龄≥18岁的白天活动人群。入组时,测量48小时的血压和手腕活动情况。初始评估还包括详细的病史、心电图以及血液和尿液筛查实验室检查。如果为控制血压需要调整治疗方案,则每年或更频繁(每季度)安排相同的评估程序。因此,根据随访期间血压变化评估心血管发病率和死亡率。目前处于随访第四年的MAPEC研究,探究了通过定时服用(时间治疗)降压药物对昼夜血压模式进行适当建模,除了降低诊所测定的日间血压或ABPM测定的24小时平均血压水平之外,是否还能降低心血管、脑血管和肾脏风险。