Deegens Jeroen K J, Steenbergen Eric J, Borm George F, Wetzels Jack F M
Department of Nephrology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2008 Jan;23(1):186-92. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfm523. Epub 2007 Aug 17.
A working group has defined five subtypes of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) based on light microscopic assessment (Columbia classification). Limited information is available on the prognostic and therapeutic implications of this classification in a European population. We conducted a retrospective analysis in 93 adult patients with biopsy-proven FSGS to determine the clinical features and outcome of FSGS variants.
Renal biopsy specimens of adult patients (>16 years) diagnosed with FSGS between 1980 and 2003 were reviewed according to the Columbia classification without the knowledge of clinical outcome. The medical records were reviewed for clinical data. Primary outcomes were remission rate and renal survival.
The frequencies of the FSGS variants were: 32% NOS (FSGS not otherwise specified), 37% tip, 26% perihilar and 5% collapsing. Cellular FSGS was not found in the biopsies. The nephrotic syndrome was less frequent in FSGS NOS (57%) and perihilar FSGS (25%) compared to the tip variant (97%). Renal function was significantly better in patients with the tip variant compared to FSGS NOS (P<0.05). Glomerular sclerosis and hyalinosis was most severe in patients with perihilar FSGS, intermediate in FSGS NOS and the least severe in patients with the tip variant. Patients with perihilar FSGS were less likely to receive immunosuppressive medication. Renal survival at 5 years was significantly better for patients with the tip variant (78% for tip vs 63% and 55% for FSGS NOS and perihilar FSGS; P=0.02). Type of FSGS and serum creatinine concentration were independent predictors of renal survival. Remission rate was higher in patients with the tip variant (P=0.1).
The collapsing variant was rare in our population. Renal survival and remission rates were higher in patients with the tip variant. Use of the classification scheme for FSGS may be clinically useful.
一个工作组基于光镜评估定义了局灶节段性肾小球硬化(FSGS)的五种亚型(哥伦比亚分类法)。关于该分类法在欧洲人群中的预后和治疗意义的信息有限。我们对93例经活检证实为FSGS的成年患者进行了回顾性分析,以确定FSGS各亚型的临床特征和预后。
对1980年至2003年间诊断为FSGS的成年患者(>16岁)的肾活检标本按照哥伦比亚分类法进行回顾,且不知晓临床预后情况。查阅病历以获取临床数据。主要结局指标为缓解率和肾脏存活率。
FSGS各亚型的频率分别为:32%未分类(FSGS,未另作说明),37%顶端型,26%肾门周围型,5%塌陷型。活检中未发现细胞性FSGS。与顶端型(97%)相比,FSGS未分类(57%)和肾门周围型FSGS(25%)中肾病综合征的发生率较低。与FSGS未分类患者相比,顶端型患者的肾功能明显更好(P<0.05)。肾门周围型FSGS患者的肾小球硬化和玻璃样变性最为严重,FSGS未分类患者次之,顶端型患者最轻。肾门周围型FSGS患者接受免疫抑制药物治疗的可能性较小。顶端型患者5年时的肾脏存活率明显更高(顶端型为78%,FSGS未分类和肾门周围型FSGS分别为63%和55%;P=0.02)。FSGS类型和血清肌酐浓度是肾脏存活的独立预测因素。顶端型患者的缓解率更高(P=0.1)。
在我们的研究人群中,塌陷型罕见。顶端型患者的肾脏存活率和缓解率更高。FSGS分类方案在临床上可能有用。