Suppr超能文献

持续性非卧床腹膜透析(CAPD)患者行结肠镜检查后腹膜炎的风险及结局

Risks and outcomes of peritonitis after flexible colonoscopy in CAPD patients.

作者信息

Yip Terence, Tse Kai Chung, Lam Man Fai, Cheng Suk Wai, Lui Sing Leung, Tang Sydney, Ng Matthew, Chan Tak Mao, Lai Kar Neng, Lo Wai Kei

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Tung Wah Hospital, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Perit Dial Int. 2007 Sep-Oct;27(5):560-4.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The ISPD 2005 guidelines for peritonitis recommend antibiotic prophylaxis for patients undergoing colonoscopy with polypectomy while on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) but there is little literature to support this recommendation. This study aimed to look into the risks and outcomes of peritonitis after colonoscopy in CAPD patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All records of flexible colonoscopy performed on our CAPD patients from January 1994 to January 2006 were retrieved. Demographic and clinical data, use of antibiotics before colonoscopy, endoscopic findings, procedure performed, and peritonitis data were analyzed.

RESULTS

77 CAPD patients underwent 97 colonoscopies. No peritonitis developed in the 18 cases where antibiotics were given before colonoscopy. Among those without antibiotic prophylaxis, 4 episodes of peritonitis occurred within 24 hours after the procedure and 1 occurred 5 days later. All responded to intraperitoneal antibiotics. Colonic biopsy and polypectomy were not associated with more peritonitis (2 in 41 with biopsy vs 3 in 38 without biopsy, p = 0.67; 1 in 30 with polypectomy vs 4 in 49 without polypectomy, p = 0.64).

CONCLUSION

The risk of peritonitis after colonoscopy without antibiotic prophylaxis was 6.3%. All peritonitis episodes responded to intraperitoneal antibiotics. Colonic biopsy or polypectomy did not appear to increase the risk of peritonitis. Although statistically not significant when compared with patients without antibiotic prophylaxis, we observed no peritonitis after colonoscopy in patients that were given antibiotics for prophylactic purposes or for other reasons. The efficacy of prophylactic antibiotics would be better defined by large randomized trials.

摘要

目的

国际腹膜透析学会(ISPD)2005年腹膜炎指南建议,持续非卧床腹膜透析(CAPD)患者在接受结肠镜息肉切除术时应预防性使用抗生素,但几乎没有文献支持这一建议。本研究旨在探讨CAPD患者结肠镜检查后发生腹膜炎的风险及结局。

患者与方法

检索1994年1月至2006年1月期间在我院接受CAPD治疗的患者行结肠镜检查的所有记录。分析人口统计学和临床数据、结肠镜检查前抗生素的使用情况、内镜检查结果、所进行的操作以及腹膜炎数据。

结果

77例CAPD患者接受了97次结肠镜检查。在结肠镜检查前使用抗生素的18例患者中未发生腹膜炎。在未进行抗生素预防的患者中,4例在术后24小时内发生腹膜炎,1例在5天后发生。所有患者对腹腔内使用抗生素均有反应。结肠活检和息肉切除术与更多的腹膜炎无关(41例行活检的患者中有2例发生腹膜炎,38例未行活检的患者中有3例发生腹膜炎,p = 0.67;30例行息肉切除术的患者中有1例发生腹膜炎,49例未行息肉切除术的患者中有4例发生腹膜炎,p = 0.64)。

结论

未进行抗生素预防的结肠镜检查后发生腹膜炎的风险为6.3%。所有腹膜炎发作对腹腔内使用抗生素均有反应。结肠活检或息肉切除术似乎并未增加腹膜炎的风险。尽管与未进行抗生素预防的患者相比差异无统计学意义,但我们观察到因预防性使用抗生素或其他原因使用抗生素的患者在结肠镜检查后未发生腹膜炎。预防性抗生素的疗效需要通过大型随机试验来更好地确定。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验