Shek Daniel T L, Lee Britta M
Center for Quality of Life, Hong Kong Institute of Asia-Pacific Studies, The Chinese University of Hong Kong.
ScientificWorldJournal. 2007 Aug 17;7:1222-9. doi: 10.1100/tsw.2007.217.
Published quality of life (QOL) studies in Hong Kong indexed in the major databases were reviewed. Several observations are highlighted from this review. First, most of the published studies were empirical studies involving data collection. Second, there are more micro studies utilizing individual QOL indices than macro studies using societal indicators. Third, most studies addressed personal well-being, followed by studies on family well-being and societal well-being. Fourth, the studies were predominantly quantitative in nature. Fifth, most of the studies were based on adults and comparatively fewer studies were based on children and adolescents. Sixth, most studies were based on populations with special needs, followed by studies based on the general population, helping professionals, and caregivers. Seventh, most studies used measures of QOL rather than developed QOL measures. Finally, QOL data in Hong Kong were seldom compared with those in other places. The gaps on QOL studies in Hong Kong and future research directions are discussed.
对主要数据库中索引的香港已发表的生活质量(QOL)研究进行了综述。本次综述突出了几点观察结果。首先,大多数已发表的研究是涉及数据收集的实证研究。其次,使用个体生活质量指标的微观研究比使用社会指标的宏观研究更多。第三,大多数研究关注个人幸福感,其次是家庭幸福感和社会幸福感研究。第四,这些研究本质上主要是定量的。第五,大多数研究基于成年人,基于儿童和青少年的研究相对较少。第六,大多数研究基于有特殊需求的人群,其次是基于普通人群、帮助专业人员和照顾者的研究。第七,大多数研究使用生活质量测量方法,而不是自行开发的生活质量测量工具。最后,香港的生活质量数据很少与其他地方的数据进行比较。讨论了香港生活质量研究的差距和未来研究方向。