Suppr超能文献

组织学证实为肝硬化的肝细胞癌患者行腹腔镜与开腹肝切除术的短期和中期结果

Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with histologically proven cirrhosis: short- and middle-term results.

作者信息

Belli G, Fantini C, D'Agostino A, Cioffi L, Langella S, Russolillo N, Belli A

机构信息

Department of General and Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, S. M. Loreto Nuovo Hospital, Via A. Vespucci, 80142, Via Cimarosa 2/A, 80127, Naples, Italy.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2007 Nov;21(11):2004-11. doi: 10.1007/s00464-007-9503-6. Epub 2007 Aug 19.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Liver surgery, especially for cirrhotic patients, is one of the last areas of resistance to progress in laparoscopic surgery. This study compares the postoperative results and the 2-year patient outcomes between laparoscopic and open resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with histologically proven cirrhosis.

METHODS

From May 2000 to October 2004, 23 consecutive cirrhotic patients who underwent laparoscopic hepatectomy (LH) for HCC were compared in a retrospective analysis with a historic group of 23 patients who underwent open hepatectomy (OH). The two groups were well matched for age, gender, American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) class, tumor location and size, type of liver resection, and severity of cirrhosis. The selection criteria for both groups specified a small (size < 5 cm), exophytic, or subcapsular tumor located in the left or peripheral right segments of the liver (II-VI segments, Couinaud); a well-compensated cirrhosis (Child-Pugh A); and an ASA score lower than 3. In the LH group, 15 subsegmentectomies, 3 segmentectomies, and 5 left lateral sectionectomies were performed, as compared with 12 subsegmentectomies, 5 segmentectomies, and 6 left lateral sectionectomies in the OH group.

RESULTS

One patient in the LH group (4.3%) underwent conversion to laparotomy for inadequate exposition. The mean operative time was statistically longer for the LH group (LH, 148 min; OH, 125 min; p = 0.016), whereas blood transfusions (LH, 0%; OH, 17.3%; p = 0.036), Pringle maneuver (LH, 0%; OH, 21.73%; p = 0.017), mean hospital stay (LH, 8.3 days; OH, 12 days; p = 0.047), and postoperative complications (LH, 13%; OH, 47.8%; p = 0.010) were significantly greater in OH group. There was no statistically significant difference in mortality and 2-year survival rates between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

This study shows that LH for HCC in properly selected cirrhotic patients results in fewer early postoperative complications and a shorter hospital stay than the traditional OH. The 2-year survival rate was the same for LH and OH.

摘要

背景

肝脏手术,尤其是针对肝硬化患者的手术,是腹腔镜手术进展缓慢的最后领域之一。本研究比较了组织学证实为肝硬化的肝细胞癌患者行腹腔镜切除术和开放切除术的术后结果及2年患者预后情况。

方法

对2000年5月至2004年10月期间连续接受腹腔镜肝切除术(LH)治疗肝癌的23例肝硬化患者进行回顾性分析,并与23例接受开放肝切除术(OH)的历史对照组患者进行比较。两组在年龄、性别、美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分级、肿瘤位置和大小、肝切除类型以及肝硬化严重程度方面匹配良好。两组的选择标准均规定肿瘤较小(直径<5 cm)、外生性或位于肝左叶或右叶外周(Couinaud肝段II-VI段)的包膜下肿瘤;代偿良好的肝硬化(Child-Pugh A级);以及ASA评分低于3分。LH组进行了15例亚肝段切除术、3例肝段切除术和5例左外叶切除术,而OH组进行了12例亚肝段切除术、5例肝段切除术和6例左外叶切除术。

结果

LH组有1例患者(4.3%)因暴露不充分而转为开腹手术。LH组的平均手术时间在统计学上更长(LH组为148分钟;OH组为125分钟;p = 0.016),而OH组的输血率(LH组为0%;OH组为17.3%;p = 0.036)、Pringle手法应用率(LH组为0%;OH组为21.73%;p = 0.017)、平均住院时间(LH组为8.3天;OH组为12天;p = 0.047)和术后并发症发生率(LH组为13%;OH组为47.8%;p = 0.010)均显著更高。两组之间的死亡率和2年生存率无统计学显著差异。

结论

本研究表明,对于适当选择的肝硬化患者,肝癌的腹腔镜肝切除术比传统的开放肝切除术术后早期并发症更少,住院时间更短。腹腔镜肝切除术和开放肝切除术的2年生存率相同。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验