Cummins Steven, Curtis Sarah, Diez-Roux Ana V, Macintyre Sally
Department of Geography, Queen Mary, University of London, Mile End Road, London, UK.
Soc Sci Med. 2007 Nov;65(9):1825-38. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.05.036. Epub 2007 Aug 13.
Epidemiology, sociology, and geography have been successful in re-establishing interest in the role of place in shaping health and health inequalities. However, some of the relevant empirical research has relied on rather conventional conceptions of space and place and focused on isolating the "independent" contribution of place-level and individual-level factors. This approach may have resulted in an underestimate of the contribution of 'place' to disease risk. In this paper we argue the case for extensive (quantitative) as well as intensive (qualitative) empirical, as well as theoretical, research on health variation that incorporates 'relational', views of space and place. Specifically, we argue that research in place and health should avoid the false dualism of context and composition by recognising that there is a mutually reinforcing and reciprocal relationship between people and place. We explore in the discussion how these theoretical perspectives are beginning to influence empirical research. We argue that these approaches to understanding how place relates to health are important in order to deliver effective, 'contextually sensitive' policy interventions.
流行病学、社会学和地理学在重新唤起人们对地点在塑造健康及健康不平等方面作用的兴趣方面取得了成功。然而,一些相关的实证研究依赖于相当传统的空间和地点概念,并专注于分离地点层面和个体层面因素的“独立”贡献。这种方法可能导致低估了“地点”对疾病风险的贡献。在本文中,我们主张对纳入了空间和地点“关系性”观点的健康差异进行广泛(定量)以及深入(定性)的实证研究和理论研究。具体而言,我们认为地点与健康方面的研究应避免背景与构成的错误二元论,要认识到人与地点之间存在相互强化和相互作用的关系。我们在讨论中探讨这些理论观点如何开始影响实证研究。我们认为,这些理解地点与健康关系的方法对于提供有效的、“因地制宜”的政策干预措施很重要。