Hambly Catherine, Simpson Claire A, McIntosh Shona, Duncan Jackie S, Dalgleish Gillian D, Speakman John R
Division of Obesity and Metabolic Health, Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB21 9BS Scotland, UK.
Physiol Behav. 2007 Dec 5;92(5):985-92. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2007.07.005. Epub 2007 Jul 20.
Caloric restriction in mice can trigger gorging behaviour, which is characterized by periods of excessive food ingestion in a short time. Animals that gorge are thought to have a reduced metabolism compared to those that nibble their food over a longer period and might therefore be more able to compensate for reduced energy intake. We examined whether mice that gorged showed less weigh loss during restriction. We placed female mice (n=60) on a restriction of 75% of their ad libitum food intake (FI) for 22 days. FI and body mass (BM) were measured at 1, 2 and 24 h after food provision. Ten controls remained feeding ad lib and we selected the 10 strongest gorgers and 10 strongest non-gorgers for comparison. Mice had BM, FI, resting metabolic rate (RMR), body composition, body temperature, daily energy expenditure (DEE) and circulating levels of the regulatory hormones leptin and ghrelin measured. Gorgers had a significantly lower BM at the end of restriction than non-gorgers or controls, indicating that they were less able to compensate for the reduced energy. Both groups of restricted mice had reduced RMR, however reduced activity was only used as an energy saving mechanism in non-gorgers. Gorging mice had a significantly lower level of circulating leptin than controls and non-gorgers but no differences in ghrelin levels. Gorging mice were, in fact, less able to compensate for reduced energy intake, as they reduced RMR by a similar extent as non-gorgers, but did not reduce activity compared to non-gorgers on the same restriction level. The reduced leptin levels may drive the gorging behaviour.
对小鼠进行热量限制会引发暴饮暴食行为,其特征是在短时间内出现过度进食期。与那些长时间少量进食的动物相比,暴饮暴食的动物被认为新陈代谢较低,因此可能更有能力补偿能量摄入的减少。我们研究了暴饮暴食的小鼠在热量限制期间体重减轻是否较少。我们将雌性小鼠(n = 60)的随意采食量(FI)限制在75%,持续22天。在提供食物后1小时、2小时和24小时测量FI和体重(BM)。10只对照小鼠继续随意进食,我们选择了10只最强的暴饮暴食小鼠和10只最强的非暴饮暴食小鼠进行比较。测量小鼠的BM、FI、静息代谢率(RMR)、身体组成、体温、每日能量消耗(DEE)以及调节激素瘦素和胃饥饿素的循环水平。在限制期结束时,暴饮暴食小鼠的BM显著低于非暴饮暴食小鼠或对照小鼠,这表明它们补偿能量减少的能力较弱。两组受限制的小鼠RMR均降低,然而,活动减少仅在非暴饮暴食小鼠中作为一种节能机制。暴饮暴食小鼠的循环瘦素水平显著低于对照小鼠和非暴饮暴食小鼠,但胃饥饿素水平无差异。事实上,暴饮暴食小鼠补偿能量摄入减少的能力较弱,因为它们RMR的降低程度与非暴饮暴食小鼠相似,但在相同的限制水平下,与非暴饮暴食小鼠相比,它们并没有减少活动。瘦素水平的降低可能会驱动暴饮暴食行为。