Ding Wen-hong, Lam Yat-yin, Kaya Mehmet G, Li Wei, Chung Robin, Pepper John R, Henein Michael Y
Department of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital University of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Int J Cardiol. 2008 Aug 18;128(2):178-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2007.05.025. Epub 2007 Aug 15.
We aimed to identify the most sensitive echocardiographic measurements that predict recovery of left ventricular function following valve replacement surgery in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) and LV dysfunction.
We studied 66 patients (mean age 70+/-2 years, 53 male) who underwent AVR for severe AS with concurrent LV dysfunction between 1998 and 2003 at the Royal Brompton Hospital. Clinical symptoms, co-morbidities and echocardiographic measurements of LV function were recorded before and at a median follow-up of 46 months after AVR. Pre-operative LV systolic dysfunction was defined as LV ejection fraction (EF) <50% and the post-op LV recovery as an increase of EF >10%.
Following AVR peak aortic pressure gradient decreased and aortic valve area index increased (64+/-3 to 19+/-1 mm Hg and 0.30+/-0.01 to 0.89+/-0.03 cm(2)/m(2), p<0.001 for both). LV EF increased (from 45+/-1 to 54+/-2%; p<0.001) and the LV dimensions fell (LVEDD index: from 33+/-1 to 30+/-1 mm/m(2); and LVESD index: from 27+/-1 to 20+/-1 mm/m(2); p<0.01 for both). LV diastolic dysfunction improved as evidenced by the fall in E/A ratio (from 2.6+/-0.2 to 1.9+/-0.4) and prolongation of total filling time; (from 29.2+/-0.6 to 31.4+/-0.5 s/min, p=0.01 for both). Among all echocardiographic variables, LV dimensions (LVEDD index, OR 0.70, CI 0.52-0.97, p<0.05; LVESD index, OR 0.57, CI 0.40-0.85, p=0.005) were the two independent predictors of post-operative LV functional recovery on multivariate analysis. A cut off value of pre-operative LVESD index=or<27.5 mm/m(2) was 85% sensitive and 72% specific in predicting intermediate-term recovery of LV function after AVR (AUC, 0.72, p=0.002).
LV functional recovery was evident in majority of aortic stenotic patients with LV dysfunction after aortic valve replacement. A lower prevalence of LV functional recovery in patients with large pre-operative LV end systolic dimension index might signify the loss of contractile reserve and thus predict post-operative functional recovery.
我们旨在确定最敏感的超声心动图测量指标,以预测重度主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)和左心室功能障碍患者瓣膜置换术后左心室功能的恢复情况。
我们研究了1998年至2003年期间在皇家布朗普顿医院接受主动脉瓣置换术(AVR)治疗重度AS并伴有左心室功能障碍的66例患者(平均年龄70±2岁,男性53例)。记录了患者术前和AVR术后中位随访46个月时的临床症状、合并症及左心室功能的超声心动图测量结果。术前左心室收缩功能障碍定义为左心室射血分数(EF)<50%,术后左心室恢复定义为EF增加>10%。
AVR术后,主动脉峰值压力梯度降低,主动脉瓣面积指数增加(分别从64±3降至19±1 mmHg和从0.30±0.01增至0.89±0.03 cm²/m²,两者p<0.001)。左心室EF增加(从45±1%增至54±2%;p<0.001),左心室尺寸减小(左心室舒张末期内径指数:从33±1降至30±1 mm/m²;左心室收缩末期内径指数:从27±1降至20±1 mm/m²;两者p<0.01)。左心室舒张功能障碍改善,表现为E/A比值下降(从2.6±0.2降至1.9±0.4)和总充盈时间延长(从29.2±0.6增至31.4±0.5 s/min,两者p=0.01)。在所有超声心动图变量中,多因素分析显示左心室尺寸(左心室舒张末期内径指数,OR 0.70,CI 0.52 - 0.97,p<0.05;左心室收缩末期内径指数,OR 0.57,CI 0.40 - 0.85,p=0.005)是术后左心室功能恢复的两个独立预测因素。术前左心室收缩末期内径指数≤27.5 mm/m²对预测AVR术后左心室功能中期恢复的敏感性为85%,特异性为72%(AUC,0.72,p=0.002)。
大多数重度主动脉瓣狭窄伴左心室功能障碍患者在主动脉瓣置换术后左心室功能明显恢复。术前左心室收缩末期内径指数较大的患者左心室功能恢复率较低,这可能意味着收缩储备的丧失,从而可预测术后功能恢复情况。