Nakamura Koki, Funabashi Nobusada, Uehara Masae, Suzuki Kazushi, Terao Makoto, Okubo Kenji, Mita Yuzuru, Maeda Fumiaki, Komuro Issei
Department of Cardiovascular Science and Medicine, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-8-1 Inohana, Chuo-ku, Chiba City, Chiba 260-8670, Japan.
Int J Cardiol. 2008 Sep 16;129(1):42-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2007.06.060. Epub 2007 Aug 20.
To elucidate the usefulness of CT in evaluating left ventricular (LV) volumes and ejection fraction (EF) in ischemic heart disease (IHD), we compared 64-slice CT with conventional left ventriculography (CLVG).
71 subjects with suspected or confirmed IHD underwent ECG-gated enhanced CT before or after cardiac catheterization. End-diastolic volume (EDV) and end-systolic volume (ESV) of LV were selected in 20 phases of R-R interval of ECG, and data sets were reconstructed to determine EDV, ESV, SV, and EF of LV using a multislice area summation method; in CLVG these parameters were calculated from the right anterior oblique 30-degree projection.
Correlation coefficients between CT and CLVG for EDV, ESV, SV, and EF were 0.759, 0.895, 0.550, and 0.836, respectively (P<0.01). In 35 subjects without apical asynergy of LV wall motion, correlation coefficients between CT and CLVG were 0.77, 0.91, 0.63, and 0.87 respectively (P<0.01); in 36 subjects, with apical asynergy, the correlation coefficients were 0.751, 0.875, 0.503, and 0.738, respectively (P<0.01). The limits of agreement of all parameters were wider in the subjects with apical asynergy of LV wall motion than the subjects without.
There was good correlation between EDV, ESV, SV, and EF estimated by CT and those by CLVG, but CT tended to overestimate EDV and ESV and underestimate EF. In subjects with apical asynergy of LV wall motion, estimates of EF were less correlated between CT and CLVG and the limits of agreement of all parameters were wider than in those without. These discrepancies may come from the capability of CT to estimate LV wall asynergy 3-dimensionally and more accurately.
为阐明CT在评估缺血性心脏病(IHD)患者左心室(LV)容积和射血分数(EF)方面的效用,我们将64层CT与传统左心室造影(CLVG)进行了比较。
71例疑似或确诊IHD的患者在心脏导管插入术之前或之后接受了心电图门控增强CT检查。在心电图R-R间期的20个阶段选取LV的舒张末期容积(EDV)和收缩末期容积(ESV),并使用多层面积求和法重建数据集以确定LV的EDV、ESV、每搏输出量(SV)和EF;在CLVG中,这些参数是从右前斜30度投影计算得出的。
CT与CLVG测得的EDV、ESV、SV和EF之间的相关系数分别为0.759、0.895、0.550和0.836(P<0.01)。在35例LV壁运动无心尖部协同失调的患者中,CT与CLVG之间的相关系数分别为0.77、0.91、0.63和0.87(P<0.01);在36例有心尖部协同失调的患者中,相关系数分别为0.751、0.875、0.503和0.738(P<0.01)。LV壁运动有心尖部协同失调的患者所有参数的一致性界限比无心尖部协同失调的患者更宽。
CT测得的EDV、ESV、SV和EF与CLVG测得的结果之间存在良好的相关性,但CT倾向于高估EDV和ESV并低估EF。对于LV壁运动有心尖部协同失调的患者,CT与CLVG之间EF的估计相关性较低,且所有参数的一致性界限比无心尖部协同失调的患者更宽。这些差异可能源于CT三维且更准确地估计LV壁协同失调的能力。