Müller Urs, Tänzler Kristina, Bürger Alexandra, Staub Lukas, Tamcan Ozgür, Roeder Christoph, Jüni Peter, Trelle Sven
Institute for Evaluative Research in Orthopedic Surgery, University of Bern, Switzerland.
Pain. 2008 May;136(1-2):62-74. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2007.06.014. Epub 2007 Aug 17.
The objectives of this study were to develop and validate a tool for assessing pain in population-based observational studies and to develop three subscales for back/neck, upper extremity and lower extremity pain. Based on a literature review, items were extracted from validated questionnaires and reviewed by an expert panel. The initial questionnaire consisted of a pain manikin and 34 items relating to (i) intensity of pain in different body regions (7 items), (ii) pain during activities of daily living (18 items) and (iii) various pain modalities (9 items). Psychometric validation of the initial questionnaire was performed in a random sample of the German-speaking Swiss population. Analyses included tests for reliability, correlation analysis, principal components factor analysis, tests for internal consistency and validity. Overall, 16,634 of 23,763 eligible individuals participated (70%). Test-retest reliability coefficients ranged from 0.32 to 0.97, but only three coefficients were below 0.60. Subscales were constructed combining four items for each of the subscales. Item-total coefficients ranged from 0.76 to 0.86 and Cronbach's alpha were 0.75 or higher for all subscales. Correlation coefficients between subscales and three validated instruments (WOMAC, SPADI and Oswestry) ranged from 0.62 to 0.79. The final Pain Standard Evaluation Questionnaire (SEQ Pain) included 28 items and the pain manikin and accounted for the multidimensionality of pain by assessing pain location and intensity, pain during activity, triggers and time of onset of pain and frequency of pain medication. It was found to be reliable and valid for the assessment of pain in population-based observational studies.
本研究的目的是开发并验证一种用于基于人群的观察性研究中评估疼痛的工具,并为背部/颈部、上肢和下肢疼痛开发三个子量表。基于文献综述,从经过验证的问卷中提取条目,并由专家小组进行审查。初始问卷包括一个疼痛人体模型和34个与以下方面相关的条目:(i)不同身体部位的疼痛强度(7个条目),(ii)日常生活活动中的疼痛(18个条目),以及(iii)各种疼痛形式(9个条目)。在讲德语的瑞士人群随机样本中对初始问卷进行了心理测量学验证。分析包括可靠性测试、相关性分析、主成分因子分析、内部一致性和有效性测试。总体而言,23763名符合条件的个体中有16634人参与(70%)。重测信度系数范围为0.32至0.97,但只有三个系数低于0.60。每个子量表由四个条目组合构建。条目-总分系数范围为0.76至0.86,所有子量表的克朗巴哈系数均为0.75或更高。子量表与三种经过验证的工具(WOMAC、SPADI和奥斯维斯特里)之间的相关系数范围为0.62至0.79。最终的疼痛标准评估问卷(SEQ疼痛)包括28个条目和疼痛人体模型,通过评估疼痛部位和强度、活动时的疼痛、触发因素、疼痛发作时间以及疼痛药物使用频率来体现疼痛的多维度性。结果发现,它在基于人群的观察性研究中用于评估疼痛是可靠且有效的。