Suppr超能文献

淋巴结阴性胰腺癌分期的准确性:一项潜在的质量指标。

Accuracy of staging node-negative pancreas cancer: a potential quality measure.

作者信息

Tomlinson James S, Jain Sushma, Bentrem David J, Sekeris Evangelos G, Maggard Melinda A, Hines O Joe, Reber Howard A, Ko Clifford Y

机构信息

Center for Surgical Outcomes and Quality, Department of Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

出版信息

Arch Surg. 2007 Aug;142(8):767-723; discussion 773-4. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.142.8.767.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the optimal number of lymph nodes to examine for accurate staging of node-negative pancreatic adenocarcinoma after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Data from the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program (1988-2002) were used to identify 3505 patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy for adenocarcinoma of the pancreas, including 1150 patients who were pathologically node negative (pN0) and 584 patients with a single positive node (pN1a). Perioperative deaths were excluded. Univariate and multivariate survival analyses were performed.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Examination of 15 lymph nodes appears to be optimal for accurate staging of node-negative adenocarcinoma of the pancreas after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

RESULTS

The number of nodes examined ranged from 1 to 54 (median, 7 examined nodes). Univariate survival analysis demonstrated that dichotomizing the pN0 cohort on 15 or more examined lymph nodes resulted in the most statistically significant survival difference (log-rank chi(2) = 14.49). Kaplan-Meier survival curves demonstrated a median survival difference of 8 months (P < .001) in favor of the patients who had 15 or more examined nodes compared with patients with fewer than 15 examined nodes. Multivariate analysis validated that having 15 or more examined nodes was a statistically significant predictor of survival (hazard ratio, 0.63; 95% confidence interval, 0.49-0.80; P < .0001). Furthermore, a multivariate model based on the survival benefit of each additional node evaluated in the pN0 cohort demonstrated only a marginal survival benefit for analysis of more than 15 nodes. Approximately 90% of the pN1a cohort was identified with examination of 15 nodes.

CONCLUSIONS

Examination of 15 lymph nodes appears to be optimal to accurately stage node-negative adenocarcinoma of the pancreas after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Furthermore, evaluation of at least 15 lymph nodes of a pancreaticoduodenectomy specimen may serve as a quality measure in the treatment of pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

摘要

目的

确定在胰十二指肠切除术后,为准确分期无淋巴结转移的胰腺腺癌而需检查的最佳淋巴结数量。

设计、设置和患者:利用美国国立癌症研究所监测、流行病学和最终结果计划(1988 - 2002年)的数据,识别出3505例行胰腺腺癌胰十二指肠切除术的患者,其中包括1150例病理检查无淋巴结转移(pN0)的患者和584例有单个阳性淋巴结(pN1a)的患者。排除围手术期死亡病例。进行单因素和多因素生存分析。

主要观察指标

对于胰十二指肠切除术后无淋巴结转移的胰腺腺癌,检查15个淋巴结似乎是准确分期的最佳选择。

结果

检查的淋巴结数量范围为1至54个(中位数为7个)。单因素生存分析表明,将pN0队列按检查15个或更多淋巴结进行二分法划分时,生存差异在统计学上最为显著(对数秩检验卡方值 = 14.49)。Kaplan - Meier生存曲线显示,与检查淋巴结少于15个的患者相比,检查15个或更多淋巴结的患者中位生存差异为8个月(P <.001)。多因素分析证实,检查15个或更多淋巴结是生存的统计学显著预测因素(风险比为0.63;95%置信区间为0.49 - 0.80;P <.0001)。此外,基于pN0队列中每个额外淋巴结的生存获益建立的多因素模型显示,分析超过15个淋巴结时仅具有边际生存获益。通过检查15个淋巴结,大约90%的pN1a队列得以识别。

结论

对于胰十二指肠切除术后无淋巴结转移的胰腺腺癌,检查15个淋巴结似乎是准确分期的最佳选择。此外,对胰十二指肠切除标本至少检查15个淋巴结可作为胰腺腺癌治疗中的一项质量指标。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验