van Gemert-Schriks M C M, van Amerongen W E, ten Cate J M, Aartman I H A
Department of Cariology Endodontology Pedodontology, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), Universiteit van Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit, Louwesweg 1, 1066 EA Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Clin Oral Investig. 2007 Dec;11(4):337-43. doi: 10.1007/s00784-007-0138-8. Epub 2007 Aug 21.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the survival of single- and two-surface atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) restorations in the primary and permanent dentitions of children from a high-caries population, in a field setting. The study was conducted in the rainforest of Suriname, South America. ART restorations, made by four Dutch dentists, were evaluated after 6 months, 1, 2, and 3 years. Four hundred seventy-five ART restorations were placed in the primary dentition and 54 in first permanent molars of 194 children (mean age 6.09 +/- 0.48 years). Three-year cumulative survivals of single- and two-surface ART restorations in the primary dentition were 43.4 and 12.2%, respectively. Main failure characteristics were gross marginal defects and total or partial losses. Three-year cumulative survival for single-surface ART restorations in the permanent dentition was 29.6%. Main failure characteristics were secondary caries and gross marginal defects. An operator effect was found only for two-surface restorations. The results show extremely low survival rates for single- and two-surface ART restorations in the primary and permanent dentitions. The variable success for ART may initiate further discussion about alternative treatment strategies, especially in those situations where choices have to be made with respect to a well-balanced, cost-effective package of basic oral health care.
本研究的目的是在实际环境中,评估高龋患率人群中儿童乳牙和恒牙的单表面及双表面非创伤性修复治疗(ART)修复体的存留情况。该研究在南美洲苏里南的雨林地区开展。由四名荷兰牙医制作的ART修复体,在6个月、1年、2年和3年后进行评估。在194名儿童(平均年龄6.09±0.48岁)的乳牙列中放置了475个ART修复体,在第一恒磨牙中放置了54个。乳牙列中单表面和双表面ART修复体的3年累积存留率分别为43.4%和12.2%。主要失败特征为明显的边缘缺损以及全部或部分脱落。恒牙列中单表面ART修复体的3年累积存留率为29.6%。主要失败特征为继发龋和明显的边缘缺损。仅在双表面修复体中发现了术者效应。结果显示,乳牙列和恒牙列中单表面及双表面ART修复体的存留率极低。ART修复体的不同成功率可能引发关于替代治疗策略的进一步讨论,尤其是在必须就平衡、具成本效益的基本口腔保健方案做出选择的情况下。