van der Vliet J Adam, van Aalst Dennis L, Schultze Kool Leo J, Wever Jan J, Blankensteijn Jan D
Department of Vascular Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Vascular. 2007 Jul-Aug;15(4):197-200. doi: 10.2310/6670.2007.00028.
The purpose of this study was to investigate whether a protocol for permissive hypotension was feasible for patients admitted with a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (RAAA). It was aimed to limit prehospital intravenous fluid administration to 500 mL and to maintain systolic blood pressure at a range of 50 to 100 mm Hg following admission, using nitrates when indicated. The diagnosis of RAAA was confirmed with sonography, and all patients with uncontrolled hypovolemic shock immediately underwent open aneurysm repair (OAR). In all other cases, computed tomographic (CT) angiography was performed to determine the eligibility for endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). From January 1, 2004, to December 31, 2006, 95 patients with a suspected RAAA were admitted. In 77 patients, the diagnosis of RAAA was confirmed. Twenty-eight cases (36%) underwent OAR for uncontrolled hemodynamic instability. Following CT-angiographic evaluation, 25 of the remaining 49 cases were considered unsuitable for EVAR and subsequently underwent OAR. In 24 of 77 cases (31%), the RAAA was treated with EVAR. Preoperative systolic blood pressure recordings in EVAR patients showed median values (+/- SD) of 98 (+/- 34.7) mm Hg in the emergency department and 114 (+/- 26.2) mm Hg in the operating theater. The desired systolic blood pressure range of 50 to 100 mm Hg was reached in 11 of 24 cases (46%). In 13 of 24 cases (54%), a systolic blood pressure higher than 100 mm Hg was recorded for a period longer than 60 minutes. The 30-day mortality was 32 of 77 (42%), with 6 of 24 (25%) in the EVAR group and 26 of 53 (49%) in the OAR group. This is the first published series of RAAA in which a protocol of permissive hypotension has been adopted. The concept appeared to be feasible in the majority of cases. Protocol violations were sparse (n = 5). Uncontrolled hypotension occurred in 36% (28 of 77) of all patients, and the desired systolic blood pressure range was achieved in 46% (11 of 24) of the EVAR patients.
本研究的目的是调查对于腹主动脉瘤破裂(RAAA)入院患者,允许性低血压方案是否可行。目标是将院前静脉输液量限制在500 mL,并在入院后使用硝酸盐类药物(如有指征)将收缩压维持在50至100 mmHg范围内。RAAA的诊断通过超声检查得以确认,所有未控制的低血容量性休克患者立即接受开放性动脉瘤修复术(OAR)。在所有其他情况下,进行计算机断层扫描(CT)血管造影以确定是否适合进行血管内动脉瘤修复术(EVAR)。从2004年1月1日至2006年12月31日,95例疑似RAAA患者入院。其中77例确诊为RAAA。28例(36%)因血流动力学不稳定未得到控制而接受OAR。经过CT血管造影评估,其余49例中的25例被认为不适合进行EVAR,随后接受了OAR。在77例中的24例(31%)中,RAAA采用EVAR治疗。接受EVAR治疗患者的术前收缩压记录显示,急诊科的中位数(±标准差)为98(±34.7)mmHg,手术室为114(±26.2)mmHg。24例中的11例(46%)达到了50至100 mmHg的目标收缩压范围。24例中的13例(54%)记录到收缩压高于100 mmHg的时间超过60分钟。77例中的32例(42%)在30天内死亡,其中EVAR组24例中的6例(25%),OAR组53例中的26例(49%)。这是首次发表的采用允许性低血压方案的RAAA系列研究。该概念在大多数情况下似乎是可行的。违反方案的情况很少(n = 5)。所有患者中有36%(77例中的28例)发生了未控制的低血压,EVAR患者中有46%(24例中的11例)达到了目标收缩压范围。