Ruchman Richard B, Jaeger Joseph, Wiggins Ernest F, Seinfeld Syndi, Thakral Vikas, Bolla Sudha, Wallach Sara
Department of Radiology, Monmouth Medical Center, 300 Second Ave., Long Branch, NJ 07740, USA.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007 Sep;189(3):523-6. doi: 10.2214/AJR.07.2307.
At academic institutions, overnight emergency radiology examinations are interpreted by the on-call radiology resident and are reviewed by an attending radiologist in the morning. The objective of our study was to determine the rate of discrepancies between the two interpretations and the possible effect, if any, on patient care.
The preliminary reports for 11,908 emergency diagnostic imaging examinations interpreted after hours by residents over a 3-year period (January 2002-January 2005) were reviewed retrospectively for any discrepancy with the attending radiologist's final interpretation. A discrepancy was noted if verbal notification of the ordering physician was required. The medical charts of the cases for which there was a major discrepancy between the two interpretations were reviewed. The discrepancies were categorized as to the effect on patient morbidity. The resident discrepancy rates were also compared with RADPEER data from our institution.
The overall major discrepancy rate was 2.6%. This rate is comparable to RADPEER data, which found a misinterpretation rate of 2.1%. The technique most commonly involved in cases with discrepant interpretations was contrast-enhanced CT of the abdomen and pelvis, with the most common diagnosis related to acute appendicitis (total of 21 cases). The rate of discrepancy was highest for residents who were in their third year of training. The indications for these examinations varied; however, the effect on patient management was no significant effect in 92.8%, some negative effect in 6.9%, and significant negative effect in 0.3%.
The results of this investigation highlight the minimal discrepancy rate that occurs with overnight resident coverage. Thus, there is no detrimental effect on the quality of patient care from relying on preliminary interpretations made by radiology residents.
在学术机构中,夜间急诊放射学检查由随叫随到的放射科住院医师进行解读,并在次日上午由主治医师进行复查。我们研究的目的是确定两种解读之间的差异率以及对患者护理可能产生的影响(如有)。
回顾性分析在3年期间(2002年1月至2005年1月)由住院医师在下班后解读的11908份急诊诊断性影像检查的初步报告,以查找与主治医师最终解读存在的任何差异。如果需要向开单医师进行口头通知,则记录为存在差异。对两种解读存在重大差异的病例的病历进行审查。根据对患者发病率的影响对差异进行分类。还将住院医师的差异率与我们机构的RADPEER数据进行比较。
总体重大差异率为2.6%。该比率与RADPEER数据相当,后者发现的误读率为2.1%。解读存在差异的病例中最常涉及的技术是腹部和盆腔的对比增强CT,最常见的诊断与急性阑尾炎有关(共21例)。差异率在培训第三年的住院医师中最高。这些检查的指征各不相同;然而,对患者管理的影响在92.8%的病例中无显著影响,在6.9%的病例中有一些负面影响,在0.3%的病例中有显著负面影响。
本调查结果突出了夜间住院医师值班时出现的差异率极低。因此,依赖放射科住院医师的初步解读对患者护理质量没有不利影响。