Department of Radiology, Gil Medical Center, Gachon University College of Medicine, Namdong-gu, Incheon, Korea.
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 9;17(9):e0274313. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274313. eCollection 2022.
The aim of this study was to determine the rate, important findings, and risk factors related to discrepancies between on-call residents' and attending radiologists' interpretations of abdominal examinations. We identified 1132 eligible patients with abdominal radiology findings that were preliminary interpreted by on-call residents between February 2016 and September 2019. The preliminary interpretations were compared with the final interpretations by abdominal attending radiologists, including clinical data. The preliminary interpretations were analyzed by three radiologists in consensus, who categorized the reports according to organs, important findings (i.e., active bleeding, bowel obstruction, organ ischemia or infarction, and organ rupture), clinical outcomes, and discrepancies with respect to final interpretations. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the risk factors for important discrepant findings. Of 1132 patients, the bowel (n = 567, 50.1%) was the most common organ interpreted by on-call residents, followed by gallbladder/bile duct/pancreas (n = 139, 12.3%) and liver (n = 116, 10.2%). Of 1132, 359 patients (31.7%) had disease with 379 important findings: active bleeding (n = 222), organ rupture (n = 77), bowel obstruction (n = 52), bowel ischemia (n = 24), and organ infarction (n = 4). Sixty-four patients (5.6%) showed discrepancies, and 30 (2.6%) showed 32 important discrepant findings comprising 14 active bleeding, 10 bowel obstructions, 6 organ ruptures, and 2 cases of bowel ischemia. Of the 64 discrepant patients, 33 underwent delayed surgery (n = 18, 28.1%) or interventional treatment (n = 15, 23.4%). In multivariable analysis, bowel obstruction (adjusted odds ratio, 2.52; p = 0.049) was an independent risk factor for determining discrepancy between preliminary and final interpretations. The rate of overall and important discrepancies between on-call residents' and final interpretations was low. However, given that the bowel was the most frequently interpreted organ, bowel obstruction was identified as a risk factor for discrepant interpretations. The identified risk factor and findings may be useful for residents to minimize discrepancies.
本研究旨在确定在急诊住院医师和主治放射科医师对腹部检查结果的解释之间出现差异的发生率、重要发现和相关风险因素。我们确定了 1132 名符合条件的患者,他们的腹部放射学检查结果由 2016 年 2 月至 2019 年 9 月期间的值班住院医师初步解读。初步解读结果与主治放射科医师的最终解读结果进行了比较,包括临床数据。三位放射科医生对初步解读结果进行了共识分析,他们根据器官、重要发现(即活动性出血、肠阻塞、器官缺血或梗死和器官破裂)、临床结果以及与最终解读结果的差异对报告进行了分类。多变量逻辑回归分析用于评估重要不一致发现的风险因素。在 1132 名患者中,肠(n = 567,50.1%)是值班住院医师最常解读的器官,其次是胆囊/胆管/胰腺(n = 139,12.3%)和肝脏(n = 116,10.2%)。在 1132 名患者中,359 名(31.7%)患者患有 379 种疾病,其中包括 222 例活动性出血、77 例器官破裂、52 例肠阻塞、24 例肠缺血和 4 例器官梗死。64 名(5.6%)患者出现差异,30 名(2.6%)患者出现 32 种重要的不一致发现,包括 14 例活动性出血、10 例肠阻塞、6 例器官破裂和 2 例肠缺血。在 64 名差异患者中,33 名患者接受了延迟手术(n = 18,28.1%)或介入治疗(n = 15,23.4%)。多变量分析显示,肠阻塞(调整后的优势比,2.52;p = 0.049)是确定初步和最终解读结果之间差异的独立风险因素。值班住院医师和最终解读结果之间的总体和重要差异发生率较低。然而,鉴于肠是最常被解读的器官,肠阻塞被确定为不一致解读的风险因素。确定的风险因素和发现可能有助于住院医师减少差异。