Salehian Omid, Healey Jeff, Stambler Bruce, Alnemer Khalid, Almerri Khalid, Grover John, Bata Iqbal, Mann Johannes, Matthew James, Pogue Janice, Yusuf Salim, Dagenais Gilles, Lonn Eva
Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Am Heart J. 2007 Sep;154(3):448-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2007.04.062.
We evaluated the effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor ramipril on the incidence of atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients enrolled in the Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation trial.
Atrial fibrillation is the most common arrhythmia affecting the general population and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Retrospective secondary analyses of some of the large trials of ACE inhibitors have suggested that ACE inhibitors may prevent AF.
We evaluated the occurrence of AF by reviewing the electrocardiogram tracings at entry, at 2 years, and at the end of the study, as well as hospitalizations among 8335 high-risk participants from the Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation study, > or = 55 years, without known heart failure or left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction and followed for a median period of 4.5 years. We compared the impact of ramipril and matched placebo on occurrence of AF. The results were compared to similar trials.
Over the 4.5 years follow-up, the incidence of new AF was low (2.1%, 177/8335), and ramipril did not significantly reduce the rate of new AF compared with placebo (86/4291 [2.0%] vs 91/4044 [2.2%]) with an odds ratio of 0.92 (95% confidence interval, 0.68-1.24; P = .57). These results added to the previous ACE inhibitor trials (excluding trials in patients with LV dysfunction) showed no significant reduction in new AF among patients treated with these agents (1088/20,930 [5.0%] vs 1343/22,878 [5.9%]; relative risk, 0.92; 95% confidence interval, 0.80-1.05).
Although the incidence of AF was low, treatment with ramipril in this population without known LV systolic dysfunction did not significantly reduce this dysrhythmia.
我们评估了血管紧张素转换酶(ACE)抑制剂雷米普利对心脏转归预防评估试验中患者房颤(AF)发生率的影响。
房颤是影响普通人群的最常见心律失常,与发病率和死亡率增加相关。一些关于ACE抑制剂的大型试验的回顾性二次分析表明,ACE抑制剂可能预防房颤。
我们通过回顾心脏转归预防评估研究中8335名高危参与者(年龄≥55岁,无已知心力衰竭或左心室(LV)收缩功能障碍)入组时、2年时和研究结束时的心电图记录以及住院情况来评估房颤的发生,这些参与者的中位随访时间为4.5年。我们比较了雷米普利和匹配安慰剂对房颤发生的影响。将结果与类似试验进行比较。
在4.5年的随访中,新发房颤的发生率较低(2.1%,177/8335),与安慰剂相比,雷米普利并未显著降低新发房颤的发生率(86/4291 [2.0%] 对91/4044 [2.2%]),优势比为0.92(95%置信区间,0.68 - 1.24;P = 0.57)。这些结果加上之前的ACE抑制剂试验(不包括LV功能障碍患者的试验)表明,接受这些药物治疗的患者中,新发房颤没有显著降低(1088/20930 [5.0%] 对1343/22878 [5.9%];相对风险,0.92;95%置信区间,0.80 - 1.05)。
尽管房颤发生率较低,但在这个无已知LV收缩功能障碍的人群中,使用雷米普利治疗并未显著降低这种心律失常的发生率。