Hick Sandrine, Laliberté Jean-François, Meunier Jean, Chagnon Miguel, Brunette Isabelle
Department of Ophthalmology, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007 Sep;33(9):1522-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.05.029.
To evaluate consequences of misalignment during corneal topography.
Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Twenty-nine healthy subjects were enrolled in a study of 2 types of misalignment during Orbscan topography acquisition. The first was rotation, which was defined as angular deviation of the subject's visual axis away from the central fixation target, and the second was translation, defined as off-center displacement of the joined half slits on the computer screen during alignment by the technician. The effect of vertical and horizontal misalignments, by rotation or translation, was assessed. Study parameters included simulated keratometries (SimKs), mean corneal power (mean power), and corneal apex (R) and the asphericity factor (Q) values. Inferior-superior (I-S) and temporal-nasal (T-N) indices were calculated. Differences in parameter values between aligned and misaligned positions were studied. A mathematical model was also developed to simulate rotational and translational misalignment and consolidate clinical experimentation.
The mean SimK values were slightly but significantly affected by rotation. The I-S value increased significantly with downward rotation and decreased with upward rotation of the eye, while T-N values increased significantly with temporal rotation and decreased with nasal rotation. The R and Q values increased with rotation. Overall, the topography parameters were minimally affected by translation. Comparable results were obtained with the theoretical model.
Rotational misalignment of the eye during acquisition influenced topography more than the translational misalignment during focusing by the technician. Rotational misalignment induced corneal asymmetry on elevation and curvature maps as well as pseudokeratoconus patterns.
评估角膜地形图检查过程中配准不良的后果。
加拿大魁北克省蒙特利尔市的梅森纽夫 - 罗斯蒙特医院。
29名健康受试者参与了一项关于Orbscan地形图采集过程中两种配准不良类型的研究。第一种是旋转,定义为受试者视轴偏离中央注视目标的角度偏差;第二种是平移,定义为技术人员在对准过程中计算机屏幕上连接的半缝隙的偏心位移。评估了垂直和水平方向通过旋转或平移造成的配准不良的影响。研究参数包括模拟角膜曲率(SimKs)、平均角膜屈光力(平均屈光力)、角膜顶点(R)和非球面系数(Q)值。计算了上下(I - S)和颞鼻(T - N)指数。研究了对准位置和未对准位置之间参数值的差异。还开发了一个数学模型来模拟旋转和平移配准不良并巩固临床实验。
平均SimK值受旋转影响轻微但显著。I - S值随着眼球向下旋转而显著增加,随着向上旋转而降低,而T - N值随着颞侧旋转而显著增加,随着鼻侧旋转而降低。R和Q值随着旋转而增加。总体而言,地形图参数受平移影响最小。理论模型得到了类似的结果。
采集过程中眼球的旋转配准不良比技术人员对焦过程中的平移配准不良对地形图的影响更大。旋转配准不良在高度和曲率图上以及假性圆锥角膜模式中导致角膜不对称。