Elliott Meghan J, Zimmerman Deborah, Holden Rachel M
Division of Nephrology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Am J Kidney Dis. 2007 Sep;50(3):433-40. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2007.06.017.
Despite common use of warfarin, the bleeding risk associated with this treatment in hemodialysis (HD) patients is unknown.
Systematic review.
Inclusion criteria were case series, cohort studies, and randomized controlled trials in dialysis patients that examined the bleeding risk associated with warfarin use compared with no warfarin or subcutaneous heparin. Studies with fewer than 10 subjects, case reports, abstracts lacking complete data sets, review articles, and editorials were excluded.
Warfarin use compared with no warfarin or subcutaneous heparin.
Data for bleeding were reported as rates: number of bleeding episodes per number of patient-years of warfarin exposure or follow-up.
Of 79 articles and abstracts, 5 met inclusion criteria and 3 more could be added after investigators provided additional information. All studies were of HD patients, and 7 of 8 evaluated the use of warfarin for the prevention of HD access thrombosis. Intensity of anticoagulation varied. Meta-analysis was not possible because of study heterogeneity. Studies of full-intensity anticoagulation and the 1 randomized controlled trial of low-intensity anticoagulation showed major bleeding episode rates ranging from 0.1 to 0.54 events/patient-year of warfarin exposure. These rates are approximately twice as high as those of HD patients receiving either no warfarin or subcutaneous heparin.
This review is based largely on data from observational studies in which bleeding rates may be confounded by comorbidity. Relatively small sample sizes may provide imprecise estimates of rates.
Low- and full-intensity anticoagulation use in HD patients is associated with a significant bleeding risk, which has to be balanced against any potential benefit of therapy. This has to be considered carefully when prescribing warfarin to HD patients.
尽管华法林被广泛使用,但在血液透析(HD)患者中,这种治疗方法相关的出血风险尚不清楚。
系统评价。
纳入标准为透析患者的病例系列研究、队列研究和随机对照试验,这些研究比较了使用华法林与不使用华法林或皮下肝素的出血风险。受试者少于10例的研究、病例报告、缺乏完整数据集的摘要、综述文章和社论均被排除。
使用华法林与不使用华法林或皮下肝素进行比较。
出血数据以发生率报告:每华法林暴露或随访的患者年数中的出血事件数。
在79篇文章和摘要中,5篇符合纳入标准,在研究者提供更多信息后又可增加3篇。所有研究均针对HD患者,8项研究中的7项评估了华法林用于预防HD通路血栓形成的情况。抗凝强度各不相同。由于研究的异质性,无法进行荟萃分析。全强度抗凝研究和1项低强度抗凝随机对照试验显示,主要出血事件发生率为每华法林暴露患者年0.1至0.54次。这些发生率大约是未使用华法林或皮下肝素的HD患者的两倍。
本综述主要基于观察性研究的数据,其中出血率可能因合并症而混淆。相对较小的样本量可能会提供不精确的发生率估计。
HD患者使用低强度和全强度抗凝与显著的出血风险相关,这必须与治疗的任何潜在益处相权衡。在给HD患者开华法林处方时必须仔细考虑这一点。