Starkstein Sergio E, Merello Marcelo
School of Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, University of Western Australia, Western Australia, Australia.
Mov Disord. 2007 Nov 15;22(15):2156-61. doi: 10.1002/mds.21521.
The objective of this study was to examine the validity of the mentation, behavior, and mood items included in Part I of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) and to assess its usefulness to screen for dementia, psychosis, depression, and apathy. A consecutive series of 168 patients with PD were assessed by neurologists with the UPDRS, and by psychiatrists using a comprehensive neuropsychiatric evaluation blind to each other's ratings. ROC analysis demonstrated that a score of 2 or greater on the intellectual impairment item of the UPDRS had 60% sensitivity and 92% specificity to detect dementia, as diagnosed with DSM-IV criteria. When a score of 23 or lower on the MMSE was included as an additional classification variable, the sensitivity increased to 85%. A score of 2 or greater on the thought disorder item had 43% sensitivity and 92% specificity to detect psychotic symptoms (delusions or hallucinations). A score of 2 or greater on the depression item had 77% sensitivity and 82% specificity to detect major depression as diagnosed with DSM-IV criteria. Finally, a score of 2 or greater on the motivation/initiative item had 73% sensitivity and 65% specificity to detect apathy, as diagnosed with a standardized criteria. When the sample was divided into mild (i.e. Hohen-Yahr stages I and II) versus moderate-severe PD (i.e. Hohen-Yahr stages III-V), findings remained unchanged, except that the UPDRS show unacceptably low accuracy to detect psychosis in mild PD. The mentation, behavior, and mood section of the UPDRS is an adequate screen for depression and apathy, and has adequate sensitivity to detect dementia when combined with the Mini-Mental State Exam, but has low sensitivity to detect psychosis.
本研究的目的是检验统一帕金森病评定量表(UPDRS)第一部分中认知、行为和情绪项目的有效性,并评估其在筛查痴呆、精神病、抑郁和冷漠方面的有用性。168例帕金森病患者由神经科医生使用UPDRS进行评估,并由精神科医生进行全面的神经精神评估,双方对彼此的评分不知情。ROC分析表明,UPDRS认知损害项目得分为2分或更高时,检测符合DSM-IV标准的痴呆的敏感性为60%,特异性为92%。当将简易精神状态检查表(MMSE)得分23分或更低作为额外的分类变量时,敏感性提高到85%。思维障碍项目得分为2分或更高时,检测精神病性症状(妄想或幻觉)的敏感性为43%,特异性为92%。抑郁项目得分为2分或更高时,检测符合DSM-IV标准的重度抑郁的敏感性为77%,特异性为82%。最后,动机/主动性项目得分为2分或更高时,检测符合标准化标准的冷漠的敏感性为73%,特异性为65%。当样本分为轻度(即霍恩-雅尔分期I和II期)与中度至重度帕金森病(即霍恩-雅尔分期III-V期)时,结果保持不变,只是UPDRS在检测轻度帕金森病患者的精神病方面准确性低得令人无法接受。UPDRS的认知、行为和情绪部分是抑郁和冷漠的适当筛查工具,与简易精神状态检查结合使用时对检测痴呆具有足够的敏感性,但对检测精神病的敏感性较低。