El Solh Ali A, Alhajjhasan Ahmad, Ramadan Fadi H, Pineda Lilibeth A
Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Western New York Respiratory Research Center, Buffalo, New York, USA.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007 Nov;55(11):1847-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01392.x. Epub 2007 Aug 28.
To compare the clinical presentation, microbiological features, and outcomes of patients with community-acquired empyema (CAE) with those of patients with nursing home-acquired empyema (NHAE).
A retrospective observational study.
Three tertiary care centers.
One hundred fourteen patients admitted from the community and 55 patients transferred from nursing homes.
Baseline sociodemographic information, activities of daily living, Charlson Comorbidity Index score, and clinica, and microbiologic data were obtained. Outcome was assessed at hospital discharge and 6 months postdischarge.
Patients admitted from nursing homes had a delayed presentation, with dyspnea, weight loss, and anemia as the predominant manifestation. Patients with CAE presented more acutely, with fever, cough, and chest pain. Anaerobic organisms were more commonly isolated from patients with NHAE. The success rate of nonsurgical intervention was significantly lower for the NHAE patients than for the CAE group (39% vs 63; P=.01). In-hospital mortality was not significantly different between the two groups (NHAE, 18%; CAE, 8%; P=.09). In a Cox regression analysis, preadmission functional status (hazard ratio (HR)=1.26, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.19-1.4; P<.001) and surgical intervention (HR=0.47, 95% CI=0.24-0.92; P=.03) were the only variables highly correlated with long-term outcome.
Patients admitted with NHAE have distinctly different clinical and microbiological presentation from that of patients with CAE. Because of the delayed presentation in patients with NHAE, medical treatment alone may be associated with higher rate of failure. Surgical therapy should be considered for selected cases, with the aim of improving long-term survival.
比较社区获得性脓胸(CAE)患者与疗养院获得性脓胸(NHAE)患者的临床表现、微生物学特征及预后。
一项回顾性观察研究。
三个三级医疗中心。
114例来自社区的入院患者和55例从疗养院转诊的患者。
获取基线社会人口统计学信息、日常生活活动能力、Charlson合并症指数评分以及临床和微生物学数据。在出院时和出院后6个月评估预后。
从疗养院入院的患者就诊延迟,以呼吸困难、体重减轻和贫血为主要表现。CAE患者发病更急,以发热、咳嗽和胸痛为主。NHAE患者中更常分离出厌氧菌。NHAE患者非手术干预的成功率显著低于CAE组(39%对63%;P=0.01)。两组患者的院内死亡率无显著差异(NHAE为18%;CAE为8%;P=0.09)。在Cox回归分析中,入院前功能状态(风险比(HR)=1.26,95%置信区间(CI)=1.19-1.4;P<0.001)和手术干预(HR=0.47,95%CI=0.24-0.92;P=0.03)是与长期预后高度相关的仅有的变量。
NHAE入院患者的临床和微生物学表现与CAE患者明显不同。由于NHAE患者就诊延迟,单纯药物治疗可能失败率更高。对于部分病例应考虑手术治疗以提高长期生存率。