Tumminello Francesca M, Flandina Carla, Crescimanno Marilena, Leto Gaetano
Laboratory of Experimental Chemotherapy, Department of Surgery and Oncology, Policlinico Universitario P. Giaccone, Via del Vespro 129, 90127 Palermo, Italy.
Biomed Pharmacother. 2008 Feb;62(2):130-5. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2007.07.001. Epub 2007 Jul 30.
The clinical significance of serum cathepsin K and cystatin C was assessed in patients with breast cancer (BCa) or prostate cancer (PCa) with confined disease (M0) or bone metastasis (BM). Cathepsin K and cystatin C circulating levels were determined by ELISAs in 63 cancer patients, in 35 patients with nonmalignant diseases and in 42 healthy blood donors (control group). In BCa patients, cathepsin K serum levels were significantly lower than in sex matched control group (HS; p=0.0008) or in patients with primary osteoporosis (OP; p=0.0009). On the contrary, cystatin C levels were significantly higher in BCa patients than in HS (p=0.0001) or OP (p=0.017). In PCa patients, cathepsin K concentrations did not significantly differ from those measured in sex matched HS or in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Conversely, cystatin C was more elevated in cancer patients than in controls (p=0.0001) or BPH patients (p=0.0078). Furthermore, in PCa patients, a positive correlation was observed between cystatin C and cathepsin K (r(S)=0.34; p=0.047). No further relationship was highlighted between these molecules and the clinicobiological parameters of BCa or PCa progression including the number of bone lesions. Moreover, ROC curve analysis showed a poor diagnostic performance of cathepsin K and cystatin C in the detection of BM patients. Interestingly, the administration of zoledronic acid (ZA), a bisphosphonate derivative endowed with a potent antiosteoclastic activity, induced in BM patients a marked increase of cathepsin K and cystatin C serum levels compared to baseline values. However, this phenomenon was statistically significant only in the PCa group. In conclusion Cystatin C and cathepsin K may be regarded as possible markers to monitor the therapeutic response to bisphosphonate treatments. Nevertheless, their clinical value as specific gauges of skeletal metastasis remains questionable.
在患有局限性疾病(M0)或骨转移(BM)的乳腺癌(BCa)或前列腺癌(PCa)患者中评估了血清组织蛋白酶K和胱抑素C的临床意义。通过酶联免疫吸附测定法(ELISA)测定了63例癌症患者、35例非恶性疾病患者和42名健康献血者(对照组)的组织蛋白酶K和胱抑素C循环水平。在BCa患者中,组织蛋白酶K血清水平显著低于性别匹配的对照组(HS;p = 0.0008)或原发性骨质疏松症(OP)患者(p = 0.0009)。相反,BCa患者的胱抑素C水平显著高于HS(p = 0.0001)或OP(p = 0.017)。在PCa患者中,组织蛋白酶K浓度与性别匹配的HS或良性前列腺增生(BPH)患者中测得的浓度无显著差异。相反,癌症患者的胱抑素C水平高于对照组(p = 0.0001)或BPH患者(p = 0.0078)。此外,在PCa患者中,观察到胱抑素C与组织蛋白酶K之间存在正相关(r(S)=0.34;p = 0.047)。这些分子与BCa或PCa进展的临床生物学参数(包括骨病变数量)之间未发现进一步的关系。此外,ROC曲线分析显示组织蛋白酶K和胱抑素C在检测BM患者方面诊断性能较差。有趣的是,给予唑来膦酸(ZA),一种具有强大抗破骨细胞活性的双膦酸盐衍生物,与基线值相比,BM患者的组织蛋白酶K和胱抑素C血清水平显著升高。然而,这种现象仅在PCa组中具有统计学意义。总之,胱抑素C和组织蛋白酶K可被视为监测双膦酸盐治疗疗效反应的可能标志物。然而,它们作为骨转移特异性指标的临床价值仍值得怀疑。