Davis S N, Thompson C J, Brown M D, Home P D, Alberti K G
Department of Medicine, Medical School, Newcastle upon Tyne, U.K.
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 1991 Aug;13(1-2):107-17. doi: 10.1016/0168-8227(91)90041-b.
The effects of three human premixes (Mixtard, Actraphane, Humulin M3), syringe mixed 30% regular and 70% NPH insulin, regular insulin alone and NPH insulin alone, on intermediary metabolism, plasma free insulin levels and action profiles were compared using the euglycemic clamp technique. Seven normal volunteers received 20 IU of each insulin subcutaneously in a randomized fashion on separate days. The first and last 60 min of the 6 h clamp were chosen as summary measures of clinical importance. Significantly elevated plasma free insulin levels were found with all treatments compared to NPH insulin alone during the first hour, although by the final hour only Mixtard produced significantly higher levels compared to NPH (19.4 +/- 1.2, 10.5 +/- 0.3 mU/l P less than 0.01, respectively). Analysis of area under the incremental insulin absorption curve demonstrated that Mixtard produced significantly increased levels compared to syringe-mixed regular: NPH (7.6 +/- 0.8), Actraphane (9.6 +/- 1.0) and Humulin M3 (9.0 +/- 0.8 mU/l all P less than 0.05). Mixtard also resulted in significantly higher glucose infusion rates compared to the other premixes. No difference in action was found between regular and pre- or syringe-mixed human insulins during the first hour of the studies. The effects on intermediary carbohydrate and lipid metabolism were similar for syringe and premixed insulins. We conclude that: (1) fixed human insulin mixtures with NPH cause no blunting of the action of the soluble component. (2) Actraphane and Humulin M3 are similar but Mixtard may have a greater effect on some aspects of insulin action. (3) In clinical practice, fixed human insulin mixtures will be as efficacious as syringe-mixed preparations but may be easier and more convenient to use.
采用正常血糖钳夹技术,比较了三种人预混胰岛素(优泌林 70/30、诺和灵 30R、优泌乐 25)、自行混合的 30% 常规胰岛素与 70% 中效胰岛素、单独的常规胰岛素以及单独的中效胰岛素对中间代谢、血浆游离胰岛素水平和作用曲线的影响。7 名正常志愿者在不同日期以随机方式皮下注射 20IU 每种胰岛素。将 6 小时钳夹的最初和最后 60 分钟作为具有临床重要性的总结指标。与单独使用中效胰岛素相比,所有治疗在第一个小时内血浆游离胰岛素水平均显著升高,尽管到最后一小时,只有优泌林 70/30 与中效胰岛素相比产生了显著更高的水平(分别为 19.4±1.2、10.5±0.3mU/l,P<0.01)。对胰岛素吸收增量曲线下面积的分析表明,与自行混合的常规胰岛素与中效胰岛素(7.6±0.8)、诺和灵 30R(9.6±1.0)和优泌乐 25(9.0±0.8mU/l,均 P<0.05)相比,优泌林 70/30 产生的水平显著升高。优泌林 70/30 与其他预混胰岛素相比,也导致显著更高的葡萄糖输注率。在研究的第一个小时内,常规胰岛素与预混或自行混合的人胰岛素之间未发现作用差异。注射器混合胰岛素和预混胰岛素对中间碳水化合物和脂质代谢的影响相似。我们得出结论:(1)含中效胰岛素的固定人胰岛素混合物不会削弱可溶性成分的作用。(2)诺和灵 30R 和优泌乐 25 相似,但优泌林 70/30 可能对胰岛素作用的某些方面有更大影响。(3)在临床实践中,固定人胰岛素混合物将与自行混合制剂一样有效,但可能使用起来更简便、更方便。