Vaillancourt Christian, Verma Aikta, Trickett John, Crete Denis, Beaudoin Tammy, Nesbitt Lisa, Wells George A, Stiell Ian G
Ottawa Health Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Acad Emerg Med. 2007 Oct;14(10):877-83. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2007.06.021. Epub 2007 Aug 29.
To determine the frequency of agonal breathing during cardiac arrest (CA), its impact on the ability of 9-1-1 dispatchers to identify CA, and the impact of dispatch-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) instructions on bystander CPR rates.
A before-after observational study enrolling out-of-hospital adult CA patients where resuscitation was attempted in a single city with basic life support with defibrillation/advanced life support tiered emergency medical services. Victim, caller, and system characteristics were measured during two successive nine-month periods before (control group) and after (intervention group) the introduction of dispatch-assisted CPR instructions.
There were 529 CAs between July 1, 2003, and December 31, 2004. Victim characteristics were similar in the control (n = 295) and intervention (n = 234) period; mean age was 68.3 years; 66.7% were male; 50.1% of CAs were witnessed; call-to-vehicle stop was 6 minutes, 37 seconds; ventricular fibrillation/ventricular tachycardia occurred in 29.9%; and the survival rate was 4.0%. Dispatchers identified 56.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 48.9% to 63.0%) of CA cases; agonal breathing was present in 37.0% (95% CI = 30.1% to 43.9%) of all CA cases and accounted for 50.0% (95% CI = 39.1% to 60.9%) of missed diagnoses. Callers provided ventilations in 17.2% and chest compressions in 8.3% of cases as a result of the intervention. Long time intervals were observed between call to diagnosis (2 minutes, 38 seconds) and during ventilation instructions (2 minutes, 5 seconds). Bystander CPR rates increased from 16.7% in the control phase to 26.4% in the intervention phase (absolute rate, 9.7%; 95% CI = 8.5% to 11.3%; p = 0.006).
This trial demonstrates an increase in bystander CPR rate after the introduction of dispatch-assisted CPR. Agonal breathing occurred frequently and had a negative impact on the recognition of CA. There were long time intervals between call initiation and diagnosis of CA and during mouth-to-mouth ventilation instructions.
确定心脏骤停(CA)期间濒死呼吸的频率、其对911调度员识别CA能力的影响,以及调度辅助心肺复苏(CPR)指导对旁观者实施CPR比率的影响。
一项前后对照观察性研究,纳入院外成年CA患者,在一个单一城市尝试进行复苏,配备除颤的基本生命支持/分层次的高级生命支持紧急医疗服务。在引入调度辅助CPR指导之前(对照组)和之后(干预组)的两个连续9个月期间,测量受害者、呼叫者和系统特征。
在2003年7月1日至2004年12月31日期间有529例CA。对照组(n = 295)和干预组(n = 234)期间的受害者特征相似;平均年龄为68.3岁;66.7%为男性;50.1%的CA为有目击者的;呼叫至车辆到达时间为6分37秒;室颤/室性心动过速发生率为29.9%;生存率为4.0%。调度员识别出56.3%(95%置信区间[CI]=48.9%至63.0%)的CA病例;37.0%(95%CI = 30.1%至43.9%)的所有CA病例存在濒死呼吸,且占漏诊病例的50.0%(95%CI = 39.1%至60.9%)。作为干预的结果,呼叫者在17.2%的病例中进行了通气,在8.3%的病例中进行了胸外按压。在呼叫至诊断(2分38秒)以及通气指导期间(2分5秒)观察到较长的时间间隔。旁观者实施CPR的比率从对照阶段的16.7%增加到干预阶段的26.4%(绝对比率,9.7%;95%CI = 8.5%至11.3%;p = 0.006)。
该试验表明引入调度辅助CPR后旁观者实施CPR的比率有所增加。濒死呼吸频繁发生,对CA的识别有负面影响。在呼叫发起至CA诊断以及口对口通气指导期间存在较长的时间间隔。