Park Jinwoo, Galligan James J, Fink Gregory D, Swain Greg M
Department of Chemistry and the Neuroscience Program, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA.
J Physiol. 2007 Nov 1;584(Pt 3):819-34. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2007.134338. Epub 2007 Aug 30.
As arteries are resistance blood vessels while veins perform a capacitance function, it might be expected that sympathetic neural control of arteries and veins would differ. The function of sympathetic nerves supplying mesenteric arteries (MA) and veins (MV) in rats was investigated using in vitro continuous amperometry with a carbon fibre microelectrode and video imaging. We simultaneously measured noradrenaline (NA) overflow at the blood vessel adventitial surface and vasoconstriction evoked by electrical stimulation of perivascular sympathetic nerves. Sympathetic nerve arrangement was studied using glyoxylic acid-induced fluorescence of NA. We found that: (i) there were significant differences between MA and MV in the arrangement of sympathetic nerves; (ii) frequency-response curves for NA overflow and vasoconstriction for MV were left-shifted compared to MA; (iii) the P2X receptor antagonist, pyridoxal-phosphate-6-azophenyl-2',4'-disulphonic acid (PPADS, 10 microm), reduced constrictions in MA but not in MV while the alpha(1)-adrenergic receptor antagonist, prazosin (0.1 microm), blocked constrictions in MV but not in MA; (iv) NA overflow for MA was enhanced by the alpha(2)-adrenergic receptor antagonist, yohimbine (1.0 microm), and attenuated by the alpha(2)-adrenergic receptor agonist, UK 14,304 (1.0 microm), while yohimbine and UK 14,304 had little effect in MV; (v) cocaine (10 microm) produced larger increases in NA overflow in MA than in MV; (vi) UK 14,304 constricted MV but not MA while yohimbine reduced constrictions in MV but not MA. We conclude that there are fundamental differences in sympathetic neuroeffector mechanisms in MA and MV, which are likely to contribute to their different haemodynamic functions.
由于动脉是阻力血管而静脉执行容量功能,因此可以预期动脉和静脉的交感神经控制会有所不同。使用碳纤维微电极体外连续安培法和视频成像研究了大鼠肠系膜动脉(MA)和静脉(MV)的交感神经功能。我们同时测量了血管外膜表面去甲肾上腺素(NA)的溢出以及血管周围交感神经电刺激引起的血管收缩。使用乙醛酸诱导的NA荧光研究了交感神经的排列。我们发现:(i)MA和MV在交感神经排列上存在显著差异;(ii)与MA相比,MV的NA溢出和血管收缩的频率响应曲线向左移动;(iii)P2X受体拮抗剂磷酸吡哆醛-6-偶氮苯基-2',4'-二磺酸(PPADS,10微摩尔)可减少MA中的收缩,但对MV无效,而α(1)-肾上腺素能受体拮抗剂哌唑嗪(0.1微摩尔)可阻断MV中的收缩,但对MA无效;(iv)α(2)-肾上腺素能受体拮抗剂育亨宾(1.0微摩尔)可增强MA的NA溢出,而α(2)-肾上腺素能受体激动剂UK 14,304(1.0微摩尔)可减弱MA的NA溢出,而育亨宾和UK 14,304对MV几乎没有影响;(v)可卡因(10微摩尔)使MA中NA溢出的增加幅度大于MV;(vi)UK 14,304使MV收缩,但对MA无效,而育亨宾可减少MV中的收缩,但对MA无效。我们得出结论,MA和MV的交感神经效应机制存在根本差异,这可能导致它们不同的血流动力学功能。