• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于治疗心源性休克患者的经皮左心室辅助装置

Percutaneous left ventricular assist devices for treatment of patients with cardiogenic shock.

作者信息

Windecker Stephan

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Bern, Switzerland.

出版信息

Curr Opin Crit Care. 2007 Oct;13(5):521-7. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0b013e3282efd5bc.

DOI:10.1097/MCC.0b013e3282efd5bc
PMID:17762230
Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review will discuss the rationale and clinical utility of percutaneous left ventricular assist devices in the management of patients with cardiogenic shock.

RECENT FINDINGS

Left ventricular assist devices maintain partial or total circulatory support in case of severe left ventricular failure. Currently, two percutaneous left ventricular assist devices are available for clinical use: the TandemHeart and the Impella Recover LP system. Compared with the intraaortic balloon pump, the TandemHeart has been shown to significantly reduce preload and to augment cardiac output. In a randomized comparison between the TandemHeart and intraaortic balloon pump support in patients with cardiogenic shock, the improved cardiac index afforded by the left ventricular assist device resulted in a more rapid decrease in serum lactate and improved renal function. There were, however, no significant differences with respect to 30-day mortality, and complications including limb ischemia and severe bleeding were more frequent with left ventricular assist devices than intraaortic balloon pump support.

SUMMARY

The advent of percutaneous left ventricular assist devices constitutes an important advance in the management of patients with severe cardiogenic shock and may serve as bridge to recovery or heart transplantation in carefully selected patients. While improvement of hemodynamic parameters appears promising, it remains to be determined whether this benefit translates into improved clinical outcome.

摘要

综述目的

本综述将探讨经皮左心室辅助装置在心源 性休克患者管理中的原理及临床应用价值。

最新发现

在严重左心室衰竭的情况下,左心室辅助装置可维持部分或全部循环支持。目前,有两种经皮左心室辅助装置可供临床使用:TandemHeart和Impella Recover LP系统。与主动脉内球囊反搏相比,TandemHeart已被证明可显著降低前负荷并增加心输出量。在一项心源 性休克患者中TandemHeart与主动脉内球囊反搏支持的随机对照研究中,左心室辅助装置带来的心指数改善导致血清乳酸更快下降且肾功能改善。然而,30天死亡率并无显著差异,与主动脉内球囊反搏支持相比,左心室辅助装置导致的肢体缺血和严重出血等并发症更为常见。

总结

经皮左心室辅助装置的出现是严重心源 性休克患者管理中的一项重要进展,在精心挑选的患者中可作为恢复或心脏移植的桥梁。虽然血流动力学参数的改善前景乐观,但这种益处是否能转化为临床结局的改善仍有待确定。

相似文献

1
Percutaneous left ventricular assist devices for treatment of patients with cardiogenic shock.用于治疗心源性休克患者的经皮左心室辅助装置
Curr Opin Crit Care. 2007 Oct;13(5):521-7. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0b013e3282efd5bc.
2
Percutaneous left ventricular support devices.经皮左心室支持装置
Cardiol Clin. 2006 May;24(2):265-75, vii. doi: 10.1016/j.ccl.2006.01.004.
3
Percutaneous left ventricular assist devices vs. intra-aortic balloon pump counterpulsation for treatment of cardiogenic shock: a meta-analysis of controlled trials.经皮左心室辅助装置与主动脉内球囊反搏治疗心原性休克的对比:对照试验的荟萃分析。
Eur Heart J. 2009 Sep;30(17):2102-8. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehp292. Epub 2009 Jul 18.
4
Use of the percutaneous left ventricular assist device in patients with severe refractory cardiogenic shock as a bridge to long-term left ventricular assist device implantation.经皮左心室辅助装置在严重难治性心源性休克患者中作为长期左心室辅助装置植入的桥梁的应用。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2008 Jan;27(1):106-11. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2007.10.013.
5
Combined use of Impella device and intra-aortic balloon pump to improve survival in a patient in profound cardiogenic shock post cardiac arrest.心搏骤停后严重心源性休克患者使用 Impella 装置和主动脉内球囊反搏联合治疗以提高存活率。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Nov 15;74(6):975-6. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22140.
6
Randomized comparison of intra-aortic balloon support with a percutaneous left ventricular assist device in patients with revascularized acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.血管重建术后并发心源性休克的急性心肌梗死患者主动脉内球囊支持与经皮左心室辅助装置的随机对照研究
Eur Heart J. 2005 Jul;26(13):1276-83. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi161. Epub 2005 Feb 25.
7
A randomized multicenter clinical study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the TandemHeart percutaneous ventricular assist device versus conventional therapy with intraaortic balloon pumping for treatment of cardiogenic shock.一项随机多中心临床研究,旨在评估TandemHeart经皮心室辅助装置与传统主动脉内球囊反搏治疗心源性休克的安全性和有效性。
Am Heart J. 2006 Sep;152(3):469.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2006.05.031.
8
Seven years' experience with the Pierce-Donachy ventricular assist device.使用皮尔斯-多纳希心室辅助装置的七年经验。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1988 Dec;96(6):901-11.
9
Long-term survival using intra-aortic balloon pump and percutaneous right ventricular assist device for biventricular mechanical support of cardiogenic shock.使用主动脉内球囊泵和经皮右心室辅助装置对心源性休克进行双心室机械支持的长期生存情况。
J Invasive Cardiol. 2008 Jul;20(7):E205-7.
10
Use of Impella Recover 2.5 left ventricular assist device in patients with cardiogenic shock or undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention procedures: experience of a high-volume center.Impella Recover 2.5左心室辅助装置在心源性休克患者或接受高风险经皮冠状动脉介入手术患者中的应用:一个大容量中心的经验。
Minerva Cardioangiol. 2008 Aug;56(4):391-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Surgical implant techniques of left ventricular assist devices: an overview of acute and durable devices.左心室辅助装置的外科植入技术:急性和耐用装置概述
J Thorac Dis. 2015 Dec;7(12):2097-101. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2015.11.53.
2
Optimal antiarrhythmic drug therapy for electrical storm.电风暴的最佳抗心律失常药物治疗
J Biomed Res. 2015 Jan;29(1):20-34. doi: 10.7555/JBR.29.20140147. Epub 2015 Jan 15.
3
Ventricular assist device selection: which one and when?心室辅助装置的选择:选哪一种以及何时选择?
Croat Med J. 2014 Dec;55(6):596-9. doi: 10.3325/cmj.2014.55.596.
4
Use of impella ventricular assist device in patients with severe coronary artery disease presenting with cardiac arrest.在出现心脏骤停的严重冠状动脉疾病患者中使用Impella心室辅助装置。
Int J Angiol. 2012 Sep;21(3):163-6. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1324736.
5
The evaluation and management of electrical storm.电风暴的评估与处理
Tex Heart Inst J. 2011;38(2):111-21.
6
Treatment of ventricular tachycardia in patients with heart failure.心力衰竭患者室性心动过速的治疗。
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2011 Jun;13(3):203-9. doi: 10.1007/s11886-011-0182-5.
7
Emergency cardiac surgery in patients with acute coronary syndromes: a review of the evidence and perioperative implications of medical and mechanical therapeutics.急性冠状动脉综合征患者的紧急心脏手术:医学和机械治疗的证据和围手术期影响综述。
Anesth Analg. 2011 Apr;112(4):777-99. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31820e7e4f. Epub 2011 Mar 8.
8
Novel multi-functional life support system.新型多功能生命支持系统。
J Extra Corpor Technol. 2010 Sep;42(3):232-4.
9
Percutaneous left ventricular assist devices during cardiogenic shock and high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions.经皮左心室辅助装置在心源性休克和高危经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的应用。
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2009 Sep;11(5):369-76. doi: 10.1007/s11886-009-0051-7.
10
Improvement of myocardial perfusion with a percutaneously inserted left ventricular assist device.经皮插入式左心室辅助装置改善心肌灌注。
J Nucl Cardiol. 2010 Jan-Feb;17(1):158-60. doi: 10.1007/s12350-009-9127-4. Epub 2009 Aug 15.