• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用新型Vessel-X骨缺损填充容器系统和生物活性骨水泥进行椎体强化术。

Vertebral augmentation with a novel Vessel-X bone void filling container system and bioactive bone cement.

作者信息

Zheng Zhaomin, Luk Keith D K, Kuang Guanming, Li Zhaoyang, Lin Jerry, Lam Wing M, Cheung Kenneth M C, Lu William W

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.

出版信息

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Sep 1;32(19):2076-82. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181453f64.

DOI:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181453f64
PMID:17762808
Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

Evaluation of a novel, leakage-free vertebroplastic instrumentation by fresh cadaveric studies.

OBJECTIVES

To compare Vessel-X, a novel percutaneous bone void filling container system, with conventional kyphoplasty in restoring strength, stiffness, and height in experimentally induced vertebral compressive fractures and morphologically determine the cement distribution.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Clinically, both vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty perform well in reinforcement and pain relief. One of the shortcomings, however, is the risk of cement leakage. Vessel-X is a novel bone expander and bone void filler combined instrumentation for vertebral augmentation requiring evaluation.

METHODS

A total of 28 fresh-frozen vertebral specimens were randomly assigned to 4 groups for testing: unipedicular kyphoplasty, bipedicular kyphoplasty, unipedicular Vessel-X, and bipedicular Vessel-X. Compressive fractures were experimentally created on each vertebra after determining the bone mineral density. Kyphoplasty and Vessel-X were performed using bioactive bone cement (SrHAC) under C-arm fluoroscopy and compared by compression testing to measure the effects of augmentation. Morphologic observations were also performed to determine the cement distribution and vertebral height restoration.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in bone mineral density, initial strength, and stiffness in any of the groups. Furthermore, no significant difference was observed in total cement volume in intragroup comparison within the unipedicular or bipedicular groups. Vessel-X bone filler container could expand well and contain most of the cement. The height restoration ranged from 88.5% to 96.4% in all groups. The augmented strength with unipedicular and bipedicular injections reached 3651.57 N and 4833.73 N, respectively. Stiffness with bipedicular injection was significantly higher than that of unipedicular injection.

CONCLUSION

Vessel-X was comparable to kyphoplasty in restoring the mechanical properties and height of the fractured vertebrae. Interestingly, Vessel-X instrumentation showed considerably less cement leakage and better cement placement in the vertebral body. Therefore, it could be a leakage controllable technique in percutaneous vertebral augmentation.

摘要

研究设计

通过新鲜尸体研究评估一种新型无渗漏椎体成形器械。

目的

将新型经皮骨缺损填充容器系统Vessel-X与传统椎体后凸成形术在恢复实验性诱导的椎体压缩性骨折的强度、刚度和高度方面进行比较,并从形态学上确定骨水泥分布情况。

背景资料总结

临床上,椎体成形术和椎体后凸成形术在强化和缓解疼痛方面均表现良好。然而,缺点之一是骨水泥渗漏风险。Vessel-X是一种新型的用于椎体强化的骨扩张器和骨缺损填充联合器械,需要进行评估。

方法

总共28个新鲜冷冻椎体标本随机分为4组进行测试:单侧椎体后凸成形术、双侧椎体后凸成形术、单侧Vessel-X和双侧Vessel-X。在测定骨密度后,在每个椎体上实验性制造压缩性骨折。在C形臂荧光透视引导下,使用生物活性骨水泥(SrHAC)进行椎体后凸成形术和Vessel-X操作,并通过压缩测试进行比较以测量强化效果。还进行了形态学观察以确定骨水泥分布和椎体高度恢复情况。

结果

任何一组的骨密度、初始强度和刚度均无显著差异。此外,在单侧或双侧组内的组内比较中,骨水泥总体积也未观察到显著差异。Vessel-X骨填充容器能良好扩张并容纳大部分骨水泥。所有组的高度恢复范围为88.5%至96.4%。单侧和双侧注射后的强化强度分别达到3651.57 N和4833.73 N。双侧注射的刚度显著高于单侧注射。

结论

Vessel-X在恢复骨折椎体的力学性能和高度方面与椎体后凸成形术相当。有趣的是,Vessel-X器械显示骨水泥渗漏明显更少,且在椎体内的骨水泥放置更好。因此,它可能是经皮椎体强化中一种可控制渗漏的技术。

相似文献

1
Vertebral augmentation with a novel Vessel-X bone void filling container system and bioactive bone cement.采用新型Vessel-X骨缺损填充容器系统和生物活性骨水泥进行椎体强化术。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Sep 1;32(19):2076-82. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181453f64.
2
Biomechanical comparison of unipedicular versus bipedicular kyphoplasty.单节段与双节段椎体后凸成形术的生物力学比较
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Jan 15;30(2):201-5. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000150831.46856.87.
3
[Experimental study of percutaneous vertebroplasty with a novel bone void filling container system].[新型骨缺损填充容器系统经皮椎体成形术的实验研究]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2011 Apr 19;91(15):1041-6.
4
Biomechanical comparison of kyphoplasty versus a titanium mesh implant with cement for stabilization of vertebral compression fractures.球囊扩张椎体后凸成形术与钛网加骨水泥植入物治疗椎体压缩性骨折的生物力学比较。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Sep 1;35(19):1783-8. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b7cc5d.
5
[CT-based analysis of cement distribution in unipedicular vertebroplasty].基于CT的单侧椎体成形术中骨水泥分布分析
Unfallchirurg. 2006 Nov;109(11):932-9. doi: 10.1007/s00113-006-1180-8.
6
Biomechanical evaluation of calcium phosphate-based nanocomposite versus polymethylmethacrylate cement for percutaneous kyphoplasty.磷酸钙基纳米复合材料与聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯骨水泥经皮椎体后凸成形术的生物力学评价。
Spine J. 2019 Nov;19(11):1871-1884. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2019.06.007. Epub 2019 Jun 14.
7
Comparison of unipedicular and bipedicular kyphoplasty on the stiffness and biomechanical balance of compression fractured vertebrae.单双侧后凸成形术对压缩性骨折椎体刚度和生物力学平衡的比较。
Eur Spine J. 2011 Aug;20(8):1272-80. doi: 10.1007/s00586-011-1744-3. Epub 2011 Mar 8.
8
Biomechanical efficacy of unipedicular versus bipedicular vertebroplasty for the management of osteoporotic compression fractures.单侧椎弓根与双侧椎弓根椎体成形术治疗骨质疏松性压缩骨折的生物力学疗效
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999 Sep 1;24(17):1772-6. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199909010-00004.
9
Feasibility study of using viscoplastic bone cement for vertebroplasty: an in vivo clinical trial and in vitro cadaveric biomechanical examination.使用黏弹性骨水泥行椎体成形术的可行性研究:一项体内临床试验和体外尸体生物力学检查。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 May 1;35(10):E385-91. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181c9f7fc.
10
Percutaneous vertebral augmentation: an elevation in adjacent-level fracture risk in kyphoplasty as compared with vertebroplasty.经皮椎体强化术:与椎体成形术相比,后凸成形术会增加相邻节段骨折风险。
Spine J. 2007 Sep-Oct;7(5):575-82. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2006.10.020. Epub 2007 Jan 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Combined Vertebral Augmentation for Vertebral Body Fracture With Contraindications for Traditional Techniques.联合椎体增强术治疗传统技术存在禁忌证的椎体骨折
Cureus. 2023 Nov 8;15(11):e48517. doi: 10.7759/cureus.48517. eCollection 2023 Nov.
2
Lateral-Opening Injection Tool Used in Percutaneous Vertebroplasty to Treat Asymptomatic Osteoporotic Vertebral Burst Fractures: A Retrospective Study.经皮椎体后凸成形术中使用侧向开口注射工具治疗无症状性骨质疏松性椎体爆裂骨折:一项回顾性研究。
Orthop Surg. 2022 Nov;14(11):2914-2924. doi: 10.1111/os.13519. Epub 2022 Sep 28.
3
Vessel-Plasty Using Bone-Filling Mesh Container for Treatment of Malignant Severe Compression Fractures in Cervical Vertebrae.
采用骨填充网状容器进行血管成形术治疗颈椎恶性严重压缩性骨折
J Pain Res. 2022 Apr 21;15:1173-1182. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S360195. eCollection 2022.
4
Different Associated Aspects That Influence Complication Rates on Clinical PKP Surgery Using Smart Medical Big Data.利用智能医疗大数据分析影响 PKPP 手术并发症发生率的不同相关因素
J Healthc Eng. 2022 Mar 21;2022:8432360. doi: 10.1155/2022/8432360. eCollection 2022.
5
Finite Element Analysis of Unilateral versus Bipedicular Bone-Filling Mesh Container for the Management of Osteoporotic Compression Fractures.单侧与双侧骨填充网盒治疗骨质疏松性压缩骨折的有限元分析。
Biomed Res Int. 2022 Feb 24;2022:6850089. doi: 10.1155/2022/6850089. eCollection 2022.
6
Vesselplasty versus vertebroplasty in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures with posterior wall rupture.球囊扩张椎体后凸成形术与椎体成形术治疗伴后壁破裂的骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的比较。
J Int Med Res. 2021 Dec;49(12):3000605211066303. doi: 10.1177/03000605211066303.
7
Augmentation of a Locking Plate System Using Bioactive Bone Cement-Experiment in a Proximal Humeral Fracture Model.使用生物活性骨水泥增强锁定钢板系统——在肱骨近端骨折模型中的实验
Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2018 Oct 8;9:2151459318795312. doi: 10.1177/2151459318795312. eCollection 2018.
8
The implantation of a Nickel-Titanium shape memory alloy ameliorates vertebral body compression fractures: a cadaveric study.镍钛形状记忆合金植入改善椎体压缩性骨折:一项尸体研究。
Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015 Sep 15;8(9):16899-906. eCollection 2015.
9
Nanotechnology for treating osteoporotic vertebral fractures.用于治疗骨质疏松性椎体骨折的纳米技术。
Int J Nanomedicine. 2015 Aug 13;10:5139-57. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S85037. eCollection 2015.
10
Thoraco-lumbar traumatic vertebral fractures augmentation by osteo-conductive and osteo-inductive bone substitute containing strontium-hydroxyapatite: our experience.
Neuroradiology. 2014 Jun;56(6):459-66. doi: 10.1007/s00234-014-1351-1. Epub 2014 Mar 21.