Nasir Khurram, Shaw Leslee J, Liu Sandy T, Weinstein Steven R, Mosler Tristen R, Flores Phillip R, Flores Ferdinand R, Raggi Paolo, Berman Daniel S, Blumenthal Roger S, Budoff Matthew J
Cardiac MRI PET CT Program, Massachusetts General Hospital Boston, Harvard School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 Sep 4;50(10):953-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.03.066. Epub 2007 Aug 20.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of coronary artery calcium (CAC), a known marker of subclinical atherosclerosis, in a large, ethnically diverse cohort of 14,812 patients for the prediction of all-cause mortality.
Disparities in case fatality rates for heart disease among ethnic groups are well known. In 2001, rates of death from heart disease were 30% higher among African Americans (AA) than non-Hispanic whites (NHW). Some of this variability may be due to differing pathophysiological mechanisms and effects of underlying atherosclerosis.
Ten-year death rates from all causes (total deaths = 505) were compared using risk-adjusted Cox proportional hazards models in AA (n = 637), Hispanic (HS, n = 1,334), Asian (AS, n = 1,065), and NHW (n = 11,776) populations.
Ethnic minority patients were generally younger (0.3 to 4 years), more often persons with diabetes (p < 0.0001), hypertensive (p < 0.0001), and female (p < 0.0001). The prevalence of CAC scores > or =100 was highest in NHW (31%) and lowest for HS (18%) (p < 0.0001). Overall survival was 96%, 93%, and 92% for AS, NHW, and HS, respectively, as compared with 83% for AA (p < 0.0001). When comparing prognosis by CAC scores in ethnic minorities as compared with NHW, relative risk ratios were highest for AA with CAC scores > or =400 exceeding 16.1 (p < 0.0001). Hispanics with CAC scores > or =400 had relative risk ratios from 7.9 to 9.0, whereas AS with CAC scores > or =1,000 had relative risk ratios 6.6-fold higher than NHW (p < 0.0001).
Consistent with population evidence, AA with increasing burden of subclinical coronary artery disease were the highest-risk ethnic minority population. These data support a growing body of evidence noting substantial differences in cardiovascular risk by ethnicity.
本研究旨在评估冠状动脉钙化(CAC)这一已知的亚临床动脉粥样硬化标志物,在一个包含14812名不同种族患者的大型队列中,对全因死亡率预测的预后价值。
不同种族间心脏病病死率的差异是众所周知的。2001年,非裔美国人(AA)的心脏病死亡率比非西班牙裔白人(NHW)高30%。这种差异部分可能归因于潜在动脉粥样硬化的不同病理生理机制和影响。
使用风险调整的Cox比例风险模型,比较了AA(n = 637)、西班牙裔(HS,n = 1334)、亚裔(AS,n = 1065)和NHW(n = 11776)人群的全因十年死亡率(总死亡人数 = 505)。
少数族裔患者通常更年轻(0.3至4岁),糖尿病患者(p < 0.0001)、高血压患者(p < 0.0001)以及女性(p < 0.0001)更为常见。CAC评分≥100的患病率在NHW中最高(31%),在HS中最低(18%)(p < 0.0001)。AS、NHW和HS的总体生存率分别为96%、93%和92%,而AA为83%(p < 0.0001)。与NHW相比,在少数族裔中按CAC评分比较预后时,CAC评分≥400的AA的相对风险比最高,超过16.1(p < 0.0001)。CAC评分≥400的西班牙裔的相对风险比为7.9至9.0,而CAC评分≥1000的AS的相对风险比是NHW的6.6倍(p < 0.0001)。
与人群证据一致,亚临床冠状动脉疾病负担增加的AA是风险最高的少数族裔人群。这些数据支持了越来越多的证据,即心血管风险因种族存在显著差异。