van Wilgen B W, Reyers B, Le Maitre D C, Richardson D M, Schonegevel L
Centre for Invasion Biology, CSIR Natural Resources and the Environment, P.O. Box 320, Stellenbosch 7599, South Africa.
J Environ Manage. 2008 Dec;89(4):336-49. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.06.015. Epub 2007 Aug 31.
This paper reports an assessment of the current and potential impacts of invasive alien plants on selected ecosystem services in South Africa. We used data on the current and potential future distribution of 56 invasive alien plant species to estimate their impact on four services (surface water runoff, groundwater recharge, livestock production and biodiversity) in five terrestrial biomes. The estimated reductions in surface water runoff as a result of current invasions were >3000 million m(3) (about 7% of the national total), most of which is from the fynbos (shrubland) and grassland biomes; the potential reductions would be more than eight times greater if invasive alien plants were to occupy the full extent of their potential range. Impacts on groundwater recharge would be less severe, potentially amounting to approximately 1.5% of the estimated maximum reductions in surface water runoff. Reductions in grazing capacity as a result of current levels of invasion amounted to just over 1% of the potential number of livestock that could be supported. However, future impacts could increase to 71%. A 'biodiversity intactness index' (the remaining proportion of pre-modern populations) ranged from 89% to 71% for the five biomes. With the exception of the fynbos biome, current invasions have almost no impact on biodiversity intactness. Under future levels of invasion, however, these intactness values decrease to around 30% for the savanna, fynbos and grassland biomes, but to even lower values (13% and 4%) for the two karoo biomes. Thus, while the current impacts of invasive alien plants are relatively low (with the exception of those on surface water runoff), the future impacts could be very high. While the errors in these estimates are likely to be substantial, the predicted impacts are sufficiently large to suggest that there is serious cause for concern.
本文报告了对外来入侵植物对南非特定生态系统服务的当前及潜在影响的评估。我们利用56种外来入侵植物物种当前及未来潜在分布的数据,来估算它们对五个陆地生物群落中四种服务(地表水径流、地下水补给、畜牧生产和生物多样性)的影响。当前入侵导致的地表水径流量估计减少量超过30亿立方米(约占全国总量的7%),其中大部分来自开普植物区系(灌丛)和草原生物群落;如果外来入侵植物占据其潜在分布范围的全部区域,潜在减少量将超过当前的八倍。对地下水补给的影响将没那么严重,可能相当于地表水径流估计最大减少量的约1.5%。当前入侵水平导致的放牧能力下降量仅略高于可承载牲畜潜在数量的1%。然而,未来的影响可能增至71%。五个生物群落的“生物多样性完整性指数”(近代以前种群的剩余比例)在89%至71%之间。除了开普植物区系生物群落外,当前的入侵对生物多样性完整性几乎没有影响。然而,在未来入侵水平下,稀树草原、开普植物区系和草原生物群落的这些完整性值降至约30%,而两个卡鲁生物群落的值则更低(分别为13%和4%)。因此,虽然外来入侵植物当前的影响相对较小(地表水径流除外),但未来的影响可能非常大。尽管这些估计中的误差可能很大,但预测的影响足够大,表明有严重的担忧理由。