Niles B L, McCrady B S
Rutgers, State University of New Jersey.
Addict Behav. 1991;16(5):223-33. doi: 10.1016/0306-4603(91)90015-a.
Three hundred and six adult medical and family practice inpatients at a university-affiliated teaching hospital were assessed for problem drinking using: (1) a short questionnaire containing the CAGE (a 4-question, self-report screening measure), and (2) a standardized review of medical records (an examination of specific blood chemistries and the physicians' and nurses' notes). Each patient completed one of two randomly assigned questionnaires containing the CAGE within the first 48 h of admission: a "Health Habits Questionnaire" or an "Alcohol Questionnaire." No significant differences were found between the two questionnaires with regard to the number of CAGE items endorsed. Overall, 16.9% of the subjects endorsed two or more CAGE items. Using the chart screening method, 11.4% of the total subjects were considered "probable" or "definite" problem drinkers. The screener's reading of the physicians' notes was the variable most important in determining overall chart screening assessment. The correlation between the two screening measures was relatively low (r = .38, p less than .001), suggesting that the two measures identify different populations of problem drinkers.
在一家大学附属医院,对306名成年内科和家庭医疗科住院患者进行了问题饮酒评估,评估方式如下:(1)使用一份包含CAGE问卷(一种4个问题的自我报告筛查量表)的简短问卷,以及(2)对病历进行标准化审查(检查特定血液化学指标以及医生和护士的记录)。每位患者在入院后的头48小时内完成了两份随机分配的包含CAGE问卷中的一份:“健康习惯问卷”或“酒精问卷”。在认可的CAGE项目数量方面,两份问卷之间未发现显著差异。总体而言,16.9%的受试者认可两个或更多CAGE项目。使用图表筛查方法,11.4%的受试者被认为是“可能的”或“确定的”问题饮酒者。筛查人员对医生记录的解读是决定整体图表筛查评估的最重要变量。两种筛查方法之间的相关性相对较低(r = 0.38,p < 0.001),这表明这两种方法识别出的问题饮酒者群体不同。