Harburg E, Gunn R, Gleiberman L, Roeper P, DiFranceisco W, Caplan R
Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 48109.
J Stud Alcohol. 1988 Nov;49(6):522-31. doi: 10.15288/jsa.1988.49.522.
The Short Michigan Alcoholism Screening Test (SMAST), often given to clinical samples to detect alcoholics, was used in a survey of a randomly selected sample (N = 1,266) in a small midwestern town, with a population of about 10,000. The specific aims were: (1) to test if scores on the SMAST would be related to these normal subject's levels of drinking; (2) to test if the SMAST could identify a drinking group who had never sought treatment for alcohol-related problems, thus defining a potential subset for help; and (3) to appraise the SMAST as a research tool for use in a general population. Results show that the number of SMAST items endorsed is significantly but modestly correlated to drinking levels, with higher volume drinkers having higher scores. This prediction was improved by removing two items reporting "not normal" drinking that had caused SMAST scores to be spuriously high. Factor analysis of test items allowed construction of five rank-ordered groups: those (1) reporting no alcohol-related SMAST problems; (2) described by two items, self-reported "not normal" drinking; (3) with one problem: "can't stop" drinking; (4) reporting problems but had not received treatment for them (the predicted group); and (5) reporting both problems and attempts at help with them (e.g., Alcoholics Anonymous). These latter two groups had significantly higher scores on several other measures of alcohol-related behavior, as well as tests measuring emotional adjustment, notably Eysenck's Neuroticism Scale and Buss and Plomin's measure of Impulsivity. The SMAST demonstrates potential usefulness in selecting problem, no-problem and patterns of use in drinkers from a normal drinking population when clusters of items are constructed to be exclusive in a Guttman-like rank order, rather than by sheer number of items endorsed or use of simple factor scores.
简短密歇根酒精中毒筛查测试(SMAST)常用于临床样本以检测酗酒者,在一个中西部小镇对一个随机抽取的样本(N = 1266)进行了调查,该小镇人口约为10000。具体目标如下:(1)测试SMAST得分是否与这些正常受试者的饮酒水平相关;(2)测试SMAST能否识别出从未因酒精相关问题寻求治疗的饮酒群体,从而确定一个潜在的需要帮助的子集;(3)评估SMAST作为用于普通人群的研究工具的效果。结果表明,认可的SMAST项目数量与饮酒水平显著但适度相关,饮酒量较大者得分较高。通过去除两个报告“不正常”饮酒的项目(这两个项目导致SMAST得分虚高),这一预测得到了改善。对测试项目进行因素分析后构建了五个等级分组:(1)报告无酒精相关SMAST问题的人;(2)由两个项目描述的,自我报告“不正常”饮酒的人;(3)有一个问题的人:“无法戒酒”;(4)报告有问题但未接受治疗的人(预测群体);(5)报告有问题并尝试寻求帮助的人(例如参加匿名戒酒会)。后两组在其他几项与酒精相关行为的测量指标上得分显著更高,在测量情绪调节的测试中得分也更高,尤其是艾森克神经质量表以及巴斯和普洛明的冲动性测量指标。当构建的项目簇以类似古特曼等级顺序的方式相互排斥,而不是通过认可的项目数量或简单因素得分时,SMAST在从正常饮酒人群中选择有问题、无问题的饮酒者以及饮酒模式方面显示出潜在的有用性。